Is Posting Links to ArXiv Not Allowed for Newcomers on Physics Forums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PAllen
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Newcomers to Physics Forums are currently restricted from posting links to arXiv, a measure implemented to combat spam. This restriction has raised questions about its permanence and the criteria for allowing links in discussions. The original poster expressed concern over this policy, noting their own experience with posting links to published papers without issue. The discussion also touches on the content of a referenced paper, which argues for the consistency of special relativity and Maxwell's equations while suggesting the Lorentz force law needs generalization. Overall, the community is awaiting clarification on the link posting policy and its implications for future discussions.
PAllen
Science Advisor
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
2,530
A recently locked thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=602940

indicated that this new poster (first post) could not post links to arxiv. Is this true, and when did it happen?

I ask because my first post to physicsforums involved two links to arxiv (unlike this case, both were published, but that is not the point of my query; though I might also note that the link of mine that was published in Annalen der Physik was much more controversial than the above thread). Also, I note that, at the time, I did not know that my links were published - a responder noted that both were published.

In this case, I hope the link is published, and the thread is re-opened, because I see the topic as well within the goals of discussion of mainstream research for these forums.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a temporary measure to help combat some recent spam attacks. If it becomes permanent we'll make an announcement.
 
Ok, I'll watch out for this. I should also note that while the thread title is provocative, the referenced paper is not really. The referenced paper does not argue an incompatibility of momentum conservation and SR. Instead, it argues that both SR and Maxwell's equations are consistent and conserve momentum, but that the Lorentz force law has problems being consistent with both SR and momentum conservation unless it is generalized (in a way proposed by Einstein in 1908). I have not read the paper carefully enough yet to agree or disagree, but that is hardly a wild claim.
 
it would be helpful if anyone replying to a homework question with a head-less link (without the htt etc) would post the whole link in their reply :smile:

(first checking of course that is isn't spam!))
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
757
Back
Top