Is quantum information research well funded?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the funding landscape for quantum information science research, particularly for PhD candidates. Participants emphasize that funding is highly variable and influenced by political factors, making long-term predictions unreliable. While there is current interest and investment from major players like IBM, the consensus is that funding can fluctuate significantly between institutions and over time. Therefore, prospective researchers should be prepared for uncertainty in funding availability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum information science principles
  • Familiarity with the current landscape of research funding
  • Knowledge of major industry players like IBM in quantum technology
  • Awareness of the political influences on scientific funding
NEXT STEPS
  • Research current funding opportunities in quantum information science
  • Explore the impact of political changes on research funding
  • Investigate the role of private companies in quantum technology funding
  • Learn about the competitive landscape of PhD programs in quantum information science
USEFUL FOR

Prospective PhD candidates in physics, researchers in quantum information science, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of research funding in emerging technologies.

ExplosivePete
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
I am applying to phd programs in physics right now. I am interested in doing research in quantum information science. I see there is a lot of interest and funding for quantum information science right now, but does anyone have any advice on whether or not this research will be well funded in the long term?

Thanks for reading,

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ExplosivePete said:
I am applying to phd programs in physics right now. I am interested in doing research in quantum information science. I see there is a lot of interest and funding for quantum information science right now, but does anyone have any advice on whether or not this research will be well funded in the long term?

Thanks for reading,

Peter

1. Where in the world are you?

2. Define "well funded", and define "long term".

3. Anyone who thinks he/she knows or able to give you anything other than a guess to your question should be looked at with extreme skepticism. Funding for science ebbs and flows with politics. Something that is "well-funded" one year can be zeroed out the next year.

4. Is not unheard of that a program at one institution is "well-funded" for the next 3 years, while the same program at another institution will have its funding cut off. So if you are in the lucky institution, you'll claim that the program is "well-funded", but if you are unlucky enough to be in the other institution, your outlook on the funding of that program sucks. So this is a sign of a well-funded program, or is it not?

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
1. Where in the world are you?

2. Define "well funded", and define "long term".

3. Anyone who thinks he/she knows or able to give you anything other than a guess to your question should be looked at with extreme skepticism. Funding for science ebbs and flows with politics. Something that is "well-funded" one year can be zeroed out the next year.

4. Is not unheard of that a program at one institution is "well-funded" for the next 3 years, while the same program at another institution will have its funding cut off. So if you are in the lucky institution, you'll claim that the program is "well-funded", but if you are unlucky enough to be in the other institution, your outlook on the funding of that program sucks. So this is a sign of a well-funded program, or is it not?

Zz.

Thanks for your reply. I am apply to programs all over the US. I take your point that research funding is very fluid and subject to change, that is a good thing to be aware of. I recognize that a reply to this question is subjective, but I think hearing those opinions is important and useful to help me get an idea of how difficult it could be for me to get funding studying quantum information.
 
My personal bet would be a yes, simply because it can be of military use in various weapon systems. Additionally some big names like IBM seem to be interested in its progress. So I guess, by any system of evaluation, quantum technology will probably be funded above average compared to other fields of research. But as @ZapperZ has said, that's more of an opinion than a qualified answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ExplosivePete

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K