Is Sechx Invertible on [0,inf)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimbo57
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the invertibility of the function sech(x) on the interval [0, ∞). Participants are exploring the conditions under which a function can be considered one-to-one, particularly focusing on the implications of having a maximum value at a boundary point of the interval.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the criteria for a function to be invertible, including the horizontal line test and the first derivative test. There is an exploration of whether a function can be one-to-one if it has a maximum at the endpoint of the interval.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants presenting differing views on the invertibility of sech(x). Some assert that it is invertible due to being monotone decreasing, while others express uncertainty regarding the implications of having a maximum at the interval's boundary.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the behavior of the function at the endpoint x=0, and how this affects the overall assessment of its invertibility. Participants are navigating the nuances of extrema in relation to the function's behavior over the specified interval.

Jimbo57
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Indicate whether the function is invertible on the given interval, explain.

Sechx on [0,inf)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So, I know a function is invertible if it's one-to-one. I can figure that out by the horizontal line test or by the first derivative test (increasing or decreasing on the interval). I know that by the first derivative test that this function has an absolute max at f(0) and is decreasing. I thought I read somewhere that a one-to-one function has to be increasing or decreasing on the interval, that f'(x) < or > 0 for all x on the interval, and that it can't have any extrema. Is this true?

The interval is the only part throwing me off here, when x=0.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Jim
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jimbo57 said:

Homework Statement



Indicate whether the function is invertible on the given interval, explain.

Sechx on [0,inf)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So, I know a function is invertible if it's one-to-one. I can figure that out by the horizontal line test or by the first derivative test (increasing or decreasing on the interval). I know that by the first derivative test that this function has an absolute max at f(0) and is decreasing. I thought I read somewhere that a one-to-one function has to be increasing or decreasing on the interval, that f'(x) < or > 0 for all x on the interval, and that it can't have any extrema. Is this true?
The last part isn't true. If the domain is some proper subset of the real line, as it is in your problem, the maximum occurs at x = 0, and the maximum value is 1.

Possibly what you're thinking of is the situation where a maximum occurs at an interior point of the domain, such as, for example, y = 1 - x2 on the restricted domain [-1, 2]. The maximum occurs at (0, 1). Since y' > 0 for x ##\in## [-1, 0) and y' < 0 for x ##\in## (0, 2], this function doesn't have an inverse.
Jimbo57 said:
The interval is the only part throwing me off here, when x=0.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Jim
 
Jimbo57 said:

Homework Statement



Indicate whether the function is invertible on the given interval, explain.

Sechx on [0,inf)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



So, I know a function is invertible if it's one-to-one. I can figure that out by the horizontal line test or by the first derivative test (increasing or decreasing on the interval). I know that by the first derivative test that this function has an absolute max at f(0) and is decreasing. I thought I read somewhere that a one-to-one function has to be increasing or decreasing on the interval, that f'(x) < or > 0 for all x on the interval, and that it can't have any extrema. Is this true?

The interval is the only part throwing me off here, when x=0.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Jim

Mark beat me to it.
 
Erm... all true... except that sech(x) does have an inverse on [0,∞) ...
 
I like Serena said:
Erm... all true... except that sech(x) does have an inverse on [0,∞) ...

You've shown that ##sech(x)## is monotone decreasing on [0,∞) by applying the first derivative test.

This tells you that ##sech(x)## is indeed one to one.
 
Actually, it has to be strictly decreasing with the possible exception of a countable number of points, which it is.
That is, it is not allowed to be constant in some interval.
 
Thanks a lot for the input but I seem to be getting two very different and very confident answers guys. Unless I'm misunderstanding something, I still feel like I'm on the fence. So, since the maxima is at the end of the interval, is it still invertible, or does that make it not invertible?
 
Jimbo57 said:
Thanks a lot for the input but I seem to be getting two very different and very confident answers guys. Unless I'm misunderstanding something, I still feel like I'm on the fence. So, since the maxima is at the end of the interval, is it still invertible, or does that make it not invertible?

If a function is strictly decreasing over an interval, then it's invertible. Having a derivative being zero at a single point doesn't make it not strictly decreasing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Your second sentence cleared up any confusion I had with regards to extrema Dick. Thanks all!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K