B Is sin(3.6) Negative in Quadrant III?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Chadi B Ghaith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative
Chadi B Ghaith
Messages
35
Reaction score
4
Why is sin(3.6) Negative? Why is sin(3.6) negative? It makes no sense. It should be positive between -90 and 90 degrees.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It makes sense if 3.6 is in radian.
 
  • Like
Likes Chadi B Ghaith
Chadi B Ghaith said:
Why is sin(3.6) NEGATIVE? Why is sin(3.6) negative? It makes no sense. It should be positive between -90 and 90 degrees.
sin(3.6°) > -0, but 3.6 by itself is considered to be in radian measure.

Also,if x is between -90° and 0°, sin(x) is negative.
 
Mark44 said:
sin(3.6°) > -0, but 3.6 by itself is considered to be in radian measure.

Also,if x is between -90° and 0°, sin(x) is negative.

Thank you Mark44.
 
Because, π<3.6<3π/2 ... 3.6 radians lies in quadrant III where sine values are negative.
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »

Thread 'Useless continued fraction for 1'

I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
View full post »

Similar threads

B Udemy Quiz Question on Radians and Quadrants
Replies
16
Views
2K
I Equation to graph a sine wave that acts like a point on a unit circle
Replies
8
Views
2K
B Measuring Angles: Negatives & Quadrants
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Whether root should be positive or negative
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Can the Housie Game Incorporate Negative and Decimal Numbers?
Replies
2
Views
1K
MHB Why is Angle C Assumed to be Acute and What is the Value of Sin C in ∆ABC?
Replies
6
Views
2K
MHB [ASK]Solution Set of a Trigonometry Inequation
Replies
4
Views
1K
MHB Find cos(x) and sin(x) if angle x has these properties....
Replies
1
Views
2K
Problem understanding negative angles....
Replies
9
Views
2K
MHB Understanding $\sin\left({\frac{1}{n^2}}\right)$ When $n > 1$
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top