Is sixfold degeneracy the maximum degeneracy an angular momentum can have?

thegreedyturt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If ψ is normalize-able and a function of nx, ny, nz, is the maximum energy degeneracy 6?

I.E. There can be degeneracy at the same Energy with each state taking a different value of n, yet adding up to some (nx^2+ny^2+nz^2)=Same E, due to the linearity of the operators involved. I guess the question is, assuming that any potential involved is physical and causes bounded states, can the maximum degenerate states be 3!.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your are looking for >6 ways to get the same sum of 3 squares?

3^2+4^2+n^2=25+n^2
5^2+0^2+n^2=25+n^2
+permutations

6^2+2^2+1^2=41
5^2+4^2+0^2=41
+permutations

7^2+1^2+n^2=50+n^2 for every n
5^2+5^2+n^2=50+n^2
+permutations (just up to 9 in per n, but without using 0^2)

I am sure there are more solutions. No idea if the number of different ways to get the same sum is bounded.
 
The question I'm struggling to get out is to say if you have a wave function that is bounded on three dimensions with a specific energy, will you at maximum have 3 different separated Schrodinger's Eq, and of those maximum versions have 3 quantization conditions for each dimension. Which implies that there are a maximum of 6 ways for the 3 quantization conditions to exist when all are different values (and the sum is of course the total E).

Or am I missing an idea with the bounds and possible potentials?
 
I am not sure if I understand the question correctly.

You are looking for solutions

(H-E)\,\psi_{E,\nu}(\vec{r}) = 0;\;\nu=1 \ldots N(E)

in D=3 dimensions. Each energy E has N-fold degeneracy where N(E) could in general depend on E.

Is this correct?

Example 1: for the hydrogen atom you have for each E i.e. each n:

l=0,1, \ldots n-1
m=-l, \ldots +l

which means that each n has n²-fold degeneracy

n=1:\;N=1
n=2:\;N=1+3=4
n=3:\;N=1+3+5=9
...
n:\;N=n^2

Example 2: for the 3-dim. square well potential the energy scales as

E = n_x^2 + n_y^2 + n_z^2

So for each E you have N-fold degenaracy where N counts the number of ways you can write the same E as sum of three squares

E = 3 = 1+1+1
E = 6 = 1+1+4 = 1+4+1 = 4+1+1
E = 9 = 1+4+4 = 4+1+4 = 4+4+1

Example 3: for the D-dim. harmonic oscillator the energy scales as

E = n_1 + n_2 + \ldots + n_D

For D=3 you have

E = 0 = 0+0+0
E = 1 = 0+0+1 = 0+1+0 = 1+0+0
E = 2 = 0+0+2 = 0+1+1 = 0+2+0 = 1+0+1 = 1+1+0 = 2+0+0

So the degeneracy for given E depends on the potential.

Usually the degeneracy N(E) reflects the dimension of a representation of a symmetry group of the potential. For rotationally invariant potentials these are the representations of SO(3), for the hydrogen atom this is SO(4), for the D-dim. Harmonic oscillator this is SU(D) which is larger than SO(D).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top