Is space infinitely divisible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ktoz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
ktoz
Messages
170
Reaction score
12
I've been pondering the measurement of distance and how it is affected by relativity and was wondering if there is some general consensus on whether spacetime is infinitely divisible?

I spent a few hours Googling but didn't come across any definitive statements either way.

I came up with the following experiment which could conceivably answer the question but find my limited knowledge isn't getting me any closer.

If you have a photon source and a photon detector and systematically fire individual photons at the detector from all points on a geodesic sphere with extremely fine tesselation (on the order of an atom between points) could there conceivably be some radius where light took longer to travel along a given vector than other vectors?

If there is a limit to how finely space can be divided then at some point, there should be a time difference because light would have to hop from node to node of the underlying structure of space and some vectors would have more nodes to hop.

If space is infinitely divisible then no matter how far the photon source is from the detector, the time would always be the same for a given radius.

Anyone care to hazard a guess?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a very wriggly can of worms. Extrapolating from quantum physics, it is believed there is a smallest length, time and energy. But at these scales space-time is not as we know it. Experiments are out of the question with our current technology because of the factor of about 10^30 btween the Planck scale and the nuclear scale.

Do a Google on 'Planck length', 'Planck time' and 'space-time foam'.

M
 
Last edited:
Mentz114 said:
Experiments are out of the question with our current technology because of the factor of about 10^30 btween the Planck scale and the nuclear scale.

Just to get some perspective on the 10^30 scale difference, I did a calculation and unless I messed up, that's like comparing a volume 1/50 the radius of this period ->.<- with the Earth. Yikes! That is small.

Thanks for the search terms Mentz114

Ken
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
47
Views
641
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top