Is Strike-Out Back? Computer Issues Investigated

  • Thread starter Thread starter JaredJames
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the reappearance of the strike-through feature for banned users, with one participant questioning if it's a widespread issue or a personal computer glitch. Another confirms that the strike-through is indeed back, alleviating concerns about additional errors on their end. There are mentions of potential computer issues, such as cache problems, affecting user experience. Overall, the conversation highlights a shared curiosity about the functionality of the strike-through feature. The return of this feature seems to be acknowledged as a positive change.
JaredJames
Messages
2,818
Reaction score
22
Just curious if you've actually brought the strike-through back for banned persons or is it just my computer 'doing its thing' again?

Only wondering because my computer has done some weird things recently and it wouldn't surprise me if some cache issue is occurring.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fair enough.

At least it isn't another error for me to fix on this end.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top