pivoxa15
- 2,250
- 1
How is this field looking?
What topics does it have?
Who are the experts in this field?
What topics does it have?
Who are the experts in this field?
pivoxa15 said:Who are the experts in this field?
ehrenfest said:Barton Zwiebach at MIT
I am just learning the basics, but from what I can tell ST is thriving and it remains the best solution to the GR-QM inconsistencies.
Check out Zwiebach's A First Course in String Theory if you want the details.
ehrenfest said:Barton Zwiebach at MIT
I am just learning the basics, but from what I can tell ST is thriving and it remains the best solution to the GR-QM inconsistencies.
Check out Zwiebach's A First Course in String Theory if you want the details.
pivoxa15 said:For one thing they are done by different communities of people so there's got to be some difference?
cristo said:I don't know what you mean by the mathematics of string theory.
JasonJo said:Algebraic geometry, mirror symmetry, Calabi-Yau manifolds, generalized geometry, BRST, super-"mathematics" - i.e. mathematics with the anticommutative property
Experts, tons of them. In the math field: Sergei Gukov, Edward Witten (cmon you got to count him), Ron Donagi, David Morrison, etc, etc.
But most people working in quantum gravity are mathematicians. It, again, comes down to where you draw this line between theoretical physics and maths-- I don't think one needs to draw the line.pivoxa15 said:Would Ed Witten be in the physics field?
timur said:I think there is a difference between mathematical physics and theoretical physics. Witten is for sure not theoretical physicist, if anything, he is a mathematical physicist.
pivoxa15 said:Pursuing string theory only as a maths theory.
pivoxa15 said:Would Ed Witten be in the physics field?
JasonJo said:He is a very special case; can you name any physicist that wrote a paper on Geometric Langlands conjecture?