Is superconductivity something usual or weird?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Spathi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superconductivity Weird
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Superconductivity is a quantum mechanical phenomenon characterized by the formation of Cooper pairs, which are bonded electrons that enable current flow without resistance. The speed of electric current in superconductors is not equal to the speed of light; instead, it is defined by the drift velocity of electrons, which is typically very low, around 8 cm/h in copper wires. Despite the high Fermi velocity of electrons, the average drift velocity remains minimal, even under significant current flow. This discussion suggests that experiments, similar to the Elitzur–Vaidman bomb test, could be devised to explore the peculiarities of superconductivity and quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of superconductivity and Cooper pairs
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics principles
  • Knowledge of electric current and drift velocity concepts
  • Basic grasp of the Elitzur–Vaidman bomb test
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of Cooper pairs in superconductors
  • Study the principles of quantum entanglement and its implications
  • Learn about the Elitzur–Vaidman bomb test and its relevance to quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the differences between drift velocity and Fermi velocity in conductors
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and researchers interested in quantum mechanics and superconductivity, as well as anyone exploring advanced concepts in electrical conductivity.

Spathi
Gold Member
Messages
102
Reaction score
10
TL;DR
Maybe an experiment with superconductors can be invented, which illustrates something weird, like Elitzur–Vaidman bomb test?
Wikipedia says that superconductivity is a phenomenon which can only be explained by quantum mechanics. Maybe there is a close relation between the connection of superconductor parts and quantum entanglement? If yes, a question arises: what is the speed of electric current flowing through the superconductor? Is it equal to the speed of light, or maybe tachyonic? Please forgive me for this question, of course I understand that the quantum entanglement does not allow to transfer information; but this stupid question gives birth to an idea – maybe an experiment with superconductors can be invented, which illustrates something weird, like Elitzur–Vaidman bomb test?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
Quantum theory is not weird but the most successful theory we have to describe Nature.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and topsquark
Spathi said:
TL;DR Summary: Maybe an experiment with superconductors can be invented, which illustrates something weird, like Elitzur–Vaidman bomb test?

Wikipedia says that superconductivity is a phenomenon which can only be explained by quantum mechanics. Maybe there is a close relation between the connection of superconductor parts and quantum entanglement? If yes, a question arises: what is the speed of electric current flowing through the superconductor? Is it equal to the speed of light, or maybe tachyonic? Please forgive me for this question, of course I understand that the quantum entanglement does not allow to transfer information; but this stupid question gives birth to an idea – maybe an experiment with superconductors can be invented, which illustrates something weird, like Elitzur–Vaidman bomb test?
The current in a superconductor is by Cooper pairs rather than single electrons. But the main principle is the same: the Cooper pairs are bonded electrons and electrons are physical particles that cannot travel faster than the speed of light. According to Wikipedia, the drift velocity of electrons in a 2mm diameter copper wire is around 8 cm/h. Cooper pairs probably don't move much faster than that.

(Changes in electric potential travel at close to the speed of light in a material. The electrons really don't move around that much.)

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Spathi said:
If yes, a question arises: what is the speed of electric current flowing through the superconductor?
That's a rather complicated question to answer, as 'speed' of the current isn't very well defined. Electrons in a conductor are always moving throughout the material in random directions at various speeds. The so-called 'drift velocity' is the average velocity of all these electrons, which, for zero current flow, averages out to zero.

Once an electric potential (voltage) is applied each electron gains a slight amount of velocity in the direction opposite of the electric field. They still move about randomly, it's just that the average velocity of the whole group is no longer zero. This average velocity is called the drift velocity and is typically very small, on the order of a few centimeters per hour. This is in stark contrast with the Fermi velocity of around 1500 km/s, which, in a simplified explanation, is around how fast each electron will be moving inside the conductor at room temperature.

Spathi said:
Is it equal to the speed of light, or maybe tachyonic?
No, not even close. Even extremely high current flows in a conductor (or superconductor) only represent a small increase in average velocity for the charges. This is because of the huge number of charges available. When you have on the order of 1022 charges per meter of wire, even a small increase in average velocity leads to a large increase in current flow. A drift velocity of 23 micrometers/second still puts 1016 charges across a cross sectional plane of the wire. Or, in other words, this small drift velocity of around 8.2 cm/h is still 1 amp of current in a 2mm diameter wire. A ludicrous 1,000 amps in the same wire would still only be a drift velocity of 23 mm/s, which is a tiny fraction of the 1500 km/s (1,500,000,000 mm/s) that individual electrons were already moving before the application of a voltage.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, topsquark and gentzen

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K