B Is superconductivity something usual or weird?

Spathi
Gold Member
Messages
102
Reaction score
10
TL;DR Summary
Maybe an experiment with superconductors can be invented, which illustrates something weird, like Elitzur–Vaidman bomb test?
Wikipedia says that superconductivity is a phenomenon which can only be explained by quantum mechanics. Maybe there is a close relation between the connection of superconductor parts and quantum entanglement? If yes, a question arises: what is the speed of electric current flowing through the superconductor? Is it equal to the speed of light, or maybe tachyonic? Please forgive me for this question, of course I understand that the quantum entanglement does not allow to transfer information; but this stupid question gives birth to an idea – maybe an experiment with superconductors can be invented, which illustrates something weird, like Elitzur–Vaidman bomb test?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quantum theory is not weird but the most successful theory we have to describe Nature.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and topsquark
Spathi said:
TL;DR Summary: Maybe an experiment with superconductors can be invented, which illustrates something weird, like Elitzur–Vaidman bomb test?

Wikipedia says that superconductivity is a phenomenon which can only be explained by quantum mechanics. Maybe there is a close relation between the connection of superconductor parts and quantum entanglement? If yes, a question arises: what is the speed of electric current flowing through the superconductor? Is it equal to the speed of light, or maybe tachyonic? Please forgive me for this question, of course I understand that the quantum entanglement does not allow to transfer information; but this stupid question gives birth to an idea – maybe an experiment with superconductors can be invented, which illustrates something weird, like Elitzur–Vaidman bomb test?
The current in a superconductor is by Cooper pairs rather than single electrons. But the main principle is the same: the Cooper pairs are bonded electrons and electrons are physical particles that cannot travel faster than the speed of light. According to Wikipedia, the drift velocity of electrons in a 2mm diameter copper wire is around 8 cm/h. Cooper pairs probably don't move much faster than that.

(Changes in electric potential travel at close to the speed of light in a material. The electrons really don't move around that much.)

-Dan
 
Spathi said:
If yes, a question arises: what is the speed of electric current flowing through the superconductor?
That's a rather complicated question to answer, as 'speed' of the current isn't very well defined. Electrons in a conductor are always moving throughout the material in random directions at various speeds. The so-called 'drift velocity' is the average velocity of all these electrons, which, for zero current flow, averages out to zero.

Once an electric potential (voltage) is applied each electron gains a slight amount of velocity in the direction opposite of the electric field. They still move about randomly, it's just that the average velocity of the whole group is no longer zero. This average velocity is called the drift velocity and is typically very small, on the order of a few centimeters per hour. This is in stark contrast with the Fermi velocity of around 1500 km/s, which, in a simplified explanation, is around how fast each electron will be moving inside the conductor at room temperature.

Spathi said:
Is it equal to the speed of light, or maybe tachyonic?
No, not even close. Even extremely high current flows in a conductor (or superconductor) only represent a small increase in average velocity for the charges. This is because of the huge number of charges available. When you have on the order of 1022 charges per meter of wire, even a small increase in average velocity leads to a large increase in current flow. A drift velocity of 23 micrometers/second still puts 1016 charges across a cross sectional plane of the wire. Or, in other words, this small drift velocity of around 8.2 cm/h is still 1 amp of current in a 2mm diameter wire. A ludicrous 1,000 amps in the same wire would still only be a drift velocity of 23 mm/s, which is a tiny fraction of the 1500 km/s (1,500,000,000 mm/s) that individual electrons were already moving before the application of a voltage.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, topsquark and gentzen
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top