Is superimposing three velocities possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nitric
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of superimposing three velocities, each greater than c/3, within the framework of relativistic physics. Participants reference Lorentz transformations to clarify the implications of such superposition. It is noted that even if one observer perceives multiple objects moving at velocities greater than c/3, the relativistic effects ensure that the final observed velocity remains less than the speed of light (c). The conversation highlights the complexities of relative motion and the limitations imposed by the theory of relativity. Ultimately, the consensus is that superimposing these velocities does not yield a resultant speed exceeding the speed of light.
Nitric
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
each of which is greater than c/3? can it work?

edit: i mean superposing* in the title
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nitric said:
each of which is greater than c/3? can it work?

edit: i mean superposing* in the title
I assume you are referring to the Lorentz transformations. Perhaps if you specified the situation you are thinking of we could be of more help.
 
Nitric said:
each of which is greater than c/3? can it work?

Nope … if A thinks B is going north at c/2, and B thinks C is going north at c/2, and C thinks D is going north at c/2, then A still thinks D is going less than c (how much? :wink:)
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Calculating the Electric field for a ring
Replies
3
Views
2K
Variation of escape velocity with equal surface gravity
Replies
7
Views
1K
Comparison between two Tippe tops
Replies
1
Views
627
Slight Confusion in Introductory Mechanics (Dynamics Problem)
Replies
15
Views
685
Velocity vectors; arrow length
Replies
3
Views
825
Internal energy of a gas and kinetic energy, "typical velocity"
Replies
5
Views
757
Rating speeds from least to greatest from a position time graph
Replies
1
Views
1K
Calculating Spacetime Intervals for Simultaneous Events
Replies
10
Views
2K
Sound Wave Interference and Finding the Path Differences with Diagrams
Replies
20
Views
5K
Quantum Tunneling to an infinite wall
Replies
8
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top