Is t>= 0 = A the Correct Equation for Correcting Math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miike012
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation t >= 0 = A is deemed correct for expressing a mathematical condition. It is suggested that a more compact notation, such as [0, ∞) or {t | t ≥ 0}, would enhance clarity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using precise mathematical language. Participants agree on the validity of the original equation while advocating for improved notation. Overall, the focus is on refining mathematical expressions for better communication.
Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
Im trying to write using more mathematical terms.. and I wanted to know if this is correct...

Look at picture..

where it says t - 0 - A it should say t>= 0 = A
 

Attachments

  • Set.jpg
    Set.jpg
    8.9 KB · Views: 453
Physics news on Phys.org
That is correct but I would write it in a more compact form, either as

[0, ∞) or

{t | t ≥ 0}
 
Cool thanks.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top