Is the Approximation tanh(t) ~ t - t^3/3 + 5t^5 Accurate as t Approaches Zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sam_0017
  • Start date Start date
sam_0017
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
so is the statement is true ??

tanh(t)~t- t^3/3 + 5t^5 as t\rightarrow 0

i find that the lim tanh (t)/(t- t^3/3 + 5t^5) = 1 when t\rightarrow 0.

so is the statement is true ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org


sam_0017 said:
tanh(t)~t- t^3/3 + 5t^5 as t\rightarrow 0

i find that the lim tanh (t)/(t- t^3/3 + 5t^5) = 1 when t\rightarrow 0.

so is the statement is true ??

Hey sam_0017 and welcome to the forums.

If you want to find a limit of something you start out with the unapproximated representation.

So it would be wise to find lim (x->0) tanh(x) = lim(x->0)sinh(x)/cosh(x). If you get something like infinity/infinity then you use things like l'hopitals rule, but if you get a determinate form then that's your answer. Also remember that sinh(x) and cosh(x) are continuous (actually tanh(x) is as well). You should get an answer of 0, but it would probably be beneficial for you if working was shown in this thread.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top