Is the Auto-Ionization of Water Exothermic or Endothermic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter STEMucator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the auto-ionization of water is exothermic or endothermic. It is established that the equilibrium constant, K_w, decreases with lower temperatures, indicating that the reaction shifts left, producing fewer products. This shift suggests that the forward reaction must be endothermic, as it absorbs heat to counteract the temperature decrease. Conversely, an increase in temperature raises K_w, favoring the production of ions, which aligns with the characteristics of an endothermic reaction. Ultimately, the consensus is that the auto-ionization of water is an endothermic process.
STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140
##K_w## and auto-ionization of water

Homework Statement



The ##K_w## value decreases as the temperature decreases. Is the auto-ionization of water an exothermic or endothermic reaction in the forward direction?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Water is able to auto-ionize into ##H_3O^{+1}## and ##OH^{-1}## in an equilibrium reaction:

##H_2O_{(L)} + H_2O_{(L)} \leftrightharpoons H_3O^{+1}_{(aq)} + OH^{-1}_{(aq)}##

The equilibrium constant for this reaction is defined as ##K_w = [H_3O^{+1}][OH^{-1}]##. It is known that the ##K_w## value increases as the temperature increases and decreases as the temperature decreases.

If ##K_w## is decreasing because temperature is decreasing, it means that the concentration of products is decreasing and so the reaction must move forward to produce more products and restore equilibrium. This means that heat must be a by-product of the reaction and therefore the overall reaction must be exothermic so that the equilibrium will shift right as the temperature decreases.

Is this reasonable?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The autoionization of water is an endothermic reaction.

If we increases the temperature Kw increases and the equilibrium shifts towards the products. Because an increase in temperature favors the endothermic side (the products, in this case) we can conclude that the forward reaction is endothermic and not exothermic.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Zondrina said:
the overall reaction must be exothermic so that the equilibrium will shift right as the temperature decreases.

But it doesn't shift right.

Think in terms of LeChatelier's principle.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Borek said:
But it doesn't shift right.

Think in terms of LeChatelier's principle.

Ah so I should think of it the other way around.

If ##K_w## is decreasing because temperature is decreasing, it means that the concentration of products is decreasing BECAUSE the reaction is shifting to the left to compensate for the heat loss. While this shift occurs, it is clear that products become reactants.

Since we added heat and the equilibrium shifted left, we can conclude the overall reaction is endothermic.

Thanks guys :)
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top