Is the current view of the intergalactic speed limit short sighted?

Bob c2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Is the current view of the intergalactic "speed limit" short sighted?

Just a question that may have some enlightening answers...
Einstein says that the interstellar speed limit is the speed of light. What happened to E=MC2?
If mass doesn't convert to energy till accelerated to the square of the speed of light, would it not follow that the increase in mass occurs as it approaches the square of the speed of light, rather than the speed of light? If this were true, then faster than light drives should be able to go many times the speed of light up to approaching the square of the speed of light.
Just a question that may have some enlightening answers...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think you're misunderstanding Einstein's energy equation. Who told you mass doesn't convert to energy unless it reaches the speed of light squared? That equation is a statement of the amount of internal energy an object has at a given mass. When combined with other relativistic equations, such as energy and momentum conservation, this equation allows mass to be converted to energy and vice versa. One example of this is pair production.

Also, there is no increase of mass as the massive object accelerates. When a massive object approaches the speed of light, its energy approaches infinity (E = mγc2) and its momentum approaches infinity (p = mγv) but its mass is invariant under Lorentz transformation. You were probably taught that an objects "relativistic mass" increases to infinity (M = γm, such that E = Mc2) but this is an outdated notion, and doesn't really help our understanding of special relativity as much as it hinders it.

The only thing special about the speed of light SQUARED is that it is the scaling factor in translating between the MASS and object has and the REST ENERGY it has. This E = mc2 equation holds no information about the universal speed limit, or what happens to E, p, or m when you approach it. It also doesn't tell you what speeds need to be reached before mass can be transformed to energy, or vice-versa. It is simply a statement of rest energy. You need to dive more into the other equations of special relativity, Lorentz transformation and Minkowski space to understand more than what this flashy equation gives you.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top