Is the Difference Between \Delta V and dV Very Small for Small \Delta x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GunnaSix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Limit
GunnaSix
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let V=x^3

Find dV and \Delta V.

Show that for very small values of x , the difference

\Delta V - dV

is very small in the sense that there exists \varepsilon such that

\Delta V - dV = \varepsilon \Delta x,

where \varepsilon \to 0 as \Delta x \to 0.

Homework Equations



dV = 3x^2 dx

\Delta V = 3x^2 \Delta x + 3x (\Delta x)^2 + (\Delta x)^3

The Attempt at a Solution



I worked it down to

\varepsilon = 3x \Delta x + (\Delta x)^2 + 3x^2 \left(1 - \frac{dx}{\Delta x} \right)

Can I say that \lim_{\Delta x \to 0} \Delta x = dx so that

\lim_{\Delta x \to 0} \varepsilon = 3x(0) + (0)^2 + 3x^2(1-1) = 0 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GunnaSix said:

Homework Statement



Let V=x^3

Find dV and \Delta V.

Show that for very small values of x , the difference

\Delta V - dV

is very small in the sense that there exists \varepsilon such that

\Delta V - dV = \varepsilon \Delta x,

where \varepsilon \to 0 as \Delta x \to 0.


Homework Equations



dV = 3x^2 dx

\Delta V = 3x^2 \Delta x + 3x (\Delta x)^2 + (\Delta x)^3


The Attempt at a Solution



I worked it down to

\varepsilon = 3x \Delta x + (\Delta x)^2 + 3x^2 \left(1 - \frac{dx}{\Delta x} \right)

Can I say that \lim_{\Delta x \to 0} \Delta x = dx so that

\lim_{\Delta x \to 0} \varepsilon = 3x(0) + (0)^2 + 3x^2(1-1) = 0 ?

You basically have it. You need to note that \Delta x and dx are the same thing, regardless of limits. Using your equations:

<br /> dV = 3x^2 dx [= 3x^2\Delta x]<br /> <br />
<br /> \Delta V = 3x^2 \Delta x + 3x (\Delta x)^2 + (\Delta x)^3<br />

you have:

<br /> \Delta V-dV= 3x (\Delta x)^2 + (\Delta x)^3 = (\Delta x)(3x\Delta x + (\Delta x)^2))= \Delta x (\varepsilon)<br />

Does this \varepsilon work? Note that you don't need to take any limits to answer the question. You just need to observe that \varepsilon \rightarrow 0 as \Delta x does.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top