Is the Direction of Magnetic Fields Truly Conventional?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pgirl1729
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    North pole South pole
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The direction of magnetic fields is conventionally defined from north to south, as established by the right-hand rule, where field vectors point out of a north pole and into a south pole. This convention is widely accepted in physics, although it is possible to define the direction using a left-hand rule, which would reverse the vector orientation. The magnetic field is classified as a vector field, exhibiting directional properties, and can be tested through its effects on moving charges. However, it is important to note that magnetic fields are technically considered pseudo-vectors due to their behavior under certain coordinate transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields and their properties
  • Familiarity with the right-hand rule in physics
  • Basic knowledge of magnetic fields and their interactions with charges
  • Concept of pseudo-vectors and their mathematical implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the right-hand rule and its applications in electromagnetism
  • Explore the concept of pseudo-vectors in physics
  • Study the effects of magnetic fields on moving charges and related experiments
  • Learn about coordinate transformations and their impact on vector quantities
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals in electromagnetism, as well as anyone interested in the foundational concepts of magnetic fields and their directional properties.

pgirl1729
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Based on what theory do they mark the magnetic field from north to south?
In many books, the direction of the magnetic field is mentioned as north to south. It says they have marked it because the north pole of the compass faces to south. But why can't we say the direction is the opposite of it as the south also attracts to north? When I browsed answers, most replies were saying it was conventional. Then exactly what could be the direction of the magnetic field? Actually, is there a direction at all? Can it be call a vector quantity
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheLogicalArc
Physics news on Phys.org
pgirl1729 said:
But why can't we say the direction is the opposite of it as the south also attracts to north?
You can. But then you have to remind everyone you communicate with that you're using the opposite sign convention to everyone else. And you have to work out where to put the minus signs in the maths because you've defined one vector as minus the usual definition.
pgirl1729 said:
Actually, is there a direction at all? Can it be call a vector quantity
Yes, the magnetic field is a vector field, yes it has a direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Dale, TheLogicalArc and 1 other person
How would you prove it has a direction? In displacement, the direction can be determined by seeing the motion.
 
pgirl1729 said:
How would one prove it has a direction?
Predict an effect based on assuming it's a vector (e.g., that electronics work) then test it (they do).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheLogicalArc and pgirl1729
The magnetic field exerts a force on a moving charge. That force obviously has a direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Ibix
Ibix said:
Predict an effect based on assuming it's a vector (e.g., that electronics work) then test it (they do).
That helped. Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheLogicalArc
pgirl1729 said:
TL;DR Summary: Based on what theory do they mark the magnetic field from north to south?

Then exactly what could be the direction of the magnetic field? Actually, is there a direction at all? Can it be call a vector quantity
As @Ibix said, the direction is a matter of convention. We have written all of our formulas with the right hand rule convention such that the field vectors point out of a north pole and into a south pole. We could instead use a left hand rule and the field vectors would point out of a south pole and into a north pole.

Technically, objects that behave this way are not actually vectors. Instead they are called pseudo-vectors. In 3 dimensions they behave a lot like actual vectors, except that under certain transformations of the coordinates they get flipped.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: pgirl1729, vanhees71 and Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K