Magnetic field "lines" confused with magnetic field "vectors"

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the distinction between magnetic field lines and magnetic field vectors, focusing on their representation, directionality, and implications in understanding magnetic fields. Participants explore theoretical concepts and practical observations related to magnets and magnetic fields.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the difference between magnetic field lines and vectors, noting that field lines are symbolic and directional arrows are a convention.
  • Another participant asserts that both the field lines and vectors point from north to south, challenging the initial claim about their direction at the south pole.
  • A participant questions whether their diagram is incorrect and seeks clarification on the direction of magnetic field vectors at both poles.
  • There is a claim that the magnetic field vector at the south pole is drawn incorrectly and should enter the magnet.
  • One participant suggests that the direction of the magnetic field vector at the south pole should be flipped 180 degrees to align with the north pole's vector.
  • A participant explains that while a line has direction, a vector has both direction and magnitude, with the density of lines indicating the strength of the field.
  • Another participant acknowledges their misunderstanding and describes an experiment with a paper clip and a bar magnet, questioning the behavior of magnetic field vectors in ferromagnetic materials.
  • One participant points out the difference in magnetic field behavior inside and outside a bar magnet, emphasizing the significance of field line density in determining field strength.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the directionality of magnetic field vectors at the south pole and the implications of field line density. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the correct representation of magnetic fields.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the behavior of magnetic field vectors in different regions of a magnet and the interpretation of field line density. Participants reference diagrams and external resources to support their claims, but no consensus is reached.

magnetics
Gold Member
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I might be a slow learner, but am still trying to understand the difference between field lines and vectors.

I've got that magnetic field lines are symbolic and that the directional arrows applied (from north to south) are a convention.

But see the attached image. The field lines form a closed loop and while within the north pole point in the same direction as the magnetic field vector. But while in the south pole of the magnet, the direction of the field line, is in the opposite direction of the field vector.

Assuming my descriptions are correct, what does this tell us about the convention of magnetic field lines and field vectors?

Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • Magnetic-Field-Lines-Vector-Forces.jpg
    Magnetic-Field-Lines-Vector-Forces.jpg
    56 KB · Views: 510
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
magnetics said:
But while in the south pole of the magnet, the direction of the field line, is in the opposite direction of the field vector
No. Both go from norh to south
 
Not exactly sure what you mean BvU.
So would that mean my diagram is incorrect and if so do the magnetic field vectors from the north and south pole both point in the same direction or do the magnetic field lines change direction somehow when shown inside one half of the magnet??
TIA.
 
The magnetic field vector at the south pole is drawn the wrong way. It should enter the magnet.
 
Thanks nasu.
Does that mean the direction for the red magnetic field vector, which we call the south pole should be flipped 180 degrees? That would mean it's pointing in the same direction as the blue north pole, you sure this is correct?
 
Basically a line only has direction. A vector has direction and magnitude. The magnitude corresponds to the density of the lines in a region. The directions are the same - why would they not be as they correspond to the path that an 'isolated N pole' would take?
 
magnetics said:
Thanks nasu.
Does that mean the direction for the red magnetic field vector, which we call the south pole should be flipped 180 degrees? That would mean it's pointing in the same direction as the blue north pole, you sure this is correct?
Yes, the arrow at the south pole is in the wrong direction. The arrows on the lines simply show the direction of a magnetic field vector tangent to the line for any point on the line.
 
Thank you for your input, I can see where my misunderstanding is derived. Thanks for the image robphy, I got my own compass and magnets out and indeed the direction of the field lines go in the one direction. Iv'e drawn the field lines correctly, but it seems not the magnetic field vectors. But that now introduces a new misunderstanding hopefully you can help me with.

Sliding a paper clip along a bar magnet and it's obvious there's very little magnetic force in the middle, while it's strongest at the ends. My understanding was that the magnetic field vectors for the domains in a ferromagnetic material would point in opposite directions in the north and south pole. This would explain why adding the vectors from the domains close to the middle of the magnet would summate to zero, hence why there's so little force detected there. While at the ends, the poles are sufficiently separated so as to not influence each other.

Obviously this is not the case, hopefully someone can provide a proper explanation? TIA.
 
  • #10

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
998
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K