Is the Distributive Property Applicable in this Set Theory Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicnicman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Property Sets
nicnicman
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
Hello all, while practicing set theory, I cam across this problem:

If A and B are sets, prove that A x (B-C) = (AxB) - (BxC).

This looks suspiciously like the distributive property but it's not. Is this simply a typo? Shouldn't the problem look like this:

A x (B-C) = (AxB) - (AxC)

Thanks for any suggestions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can easily check and understand its a typo.
Let A = {1,2},
B = {3,4}
C = {3}.
AX(B-C) = (1,4) (2,4)
AXB 1,4 2,4 1,3 2,3, and BXC = 3,3 4,3.
I hope I'm not making a full of myself and your doing things that are much more complicated then what I just said :)

Thanks, Bonaparte
 
No, you're not making a fool of yourself. I think it's a typo too.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top