Hypersphere
- 189
- 8
Hi all,
This is all in the context of interaction between (two-level) atoms and an electromagnetic field, basically the Wigner-Weisskopf model. In particular, I tried to derive the value of the atom-field interaction constant and show that it satisfied
|g_\mathbf{k}|^2=\frac{\omega_\mathbf{k}}{2\hbar \epsilon_0 V} \left( d^2 \cos^2 \theta \right)
where d is the dipole moment and \theta is the angle between the dipole moment and the polarization vector.
http://www.stanford.edu/~rsasaki/AP387/chap6 claim that the vacuum field amplitude satisfy the normalization
\int \epsilon_0 E^2 d^3r = \frac{\hbar \omega}{2}
which does lead to the above form of |g|^2, but from classical electrodynamics (eg. eq. (6.106) in Jackson, 3rd ed.) I'm used to defining the energy density of the electric field as
u_E=\frac{1}{2} \epsilon_0 E^2
Now, the notes seem to use a energy density that is 2u_E. Is there a good explanation for this, or does it boil down to one of these conventions? Thanks in advance.
This is all in the context of interaction between (two-level) atoms and an electromagnetic field, basically the Wigner-Weisskopf model. In particular, I tried to derive the value of the atom-field interaction constant and show that it satisfied
|g_\mathbf{k}|^2=\frac{\omega_\mathbf{k}}{2\hbar \epsilon_0 V} \left( d^2 \cos^2 \theta \right)
where d is the dipole moment and \theta is the angle between the dipole moment and the polarization vector.
http://www.stanford.edu/~rsasaki/AP387/chap6 claim that the vacuum field amplitude satisfy the normalization
\int \epsilon_0 E^2 d^3r = \frac{\hbar \omega}{2}
which does lead to the above form of |g|^2, but from classical electrodynamics (eg. eq. (6.106) in Jackson, 3rd ed.) I'm used to defining the energy density of the electric field as
u_E=\frac{1}{2} \epsilon_0 E^2
Now, the notes seem to use a energy density that is 2u_E. Is there a good explanation for this, or does it boil down to one of these conventions? Thanks in advance.