Is the Fate of the Universe Truly Determined by Dark Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of a recent BBC article regarding dark energy and the fate of the universe, citing Professor Priyamvada Natarajan's assertion that findings indicate a definitive outcome for the universe. However, skepticism arises about the premature nature of this conclusion, emphasizing that without a comprehensive understanding of dark energy, its constancy cannot be confirmed. The conversation highlights the equation of state for dark energy, suggesting that if it is not constant, the universe's ultimate fate remains uncertain. The results presented in the study show a consistent range for the equation of state parameter, w, but still allow for variability. Overall, the fate of the universe is still a subject of ongoing debate and research.
skydivephil
Messages
470
Reaction score
9
The BBc just publsihed this story:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11030889

The conclusion is:
"Professor Priyamvada Natarajan of Yale University, a leading cosmologist and co-author of this study, said that the findings finally proved "exactly what the fate of the Universe will be". "

Surely this is premature? Until we udnerstand what dark energy is we can't say its a contsant and if its not constant it may die down or even reverse and so the ultimate fate of the unvierse is still unknown.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Constant dark energy/cosmology constant has equation of state p = -\rho, i.e., w = -1. While it cannot be ruled out that w will remain constant, this paper's result is consistent (with smaller error bands than before) with constant w = -1.<br /> <br /> From the Science article's abstract:<br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> Combining our cosmological constraints with those from x-ray clusters and the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe 5-year data gives Wm = 0.25 T0.05 and w = −0.97 +- 0.07 </div> </div> </blockquote><br /> From the end of the article:<br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> Our results—when combined with the results from WMAP5 (40), the supernovae “Gold sample” (4), the Supernovae Legacy Survey (SNLS) (41), the ESSENCE Supernova Survey (SNEssence) (42), and the BAO peak from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) (16)—give 0.23 < \Omega_m < 0.33 and −1.12 < w < −0.82 at the 99% confidence level. </div> </div> </blockquote>
 
Back
Top