Is the Frobenius Method Required at Each Singular Point for General Solutions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ductape
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frobenius
ductape
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was just wondering, if I have a differential equation that has two regular singular points, and I am asked for the general solution, do I need to use the Frobenius method about each point seperately? I suspect that I do I just want to clarify.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have the option even not to use the Frobenius method. Can we avoid the regular point?

The Legendre's equation
(1-x2)y" - 2xy' + n(n+1)y = 0
have two regular points but we usually solve the equation about the ordinary point x=0.
 
Typically, we have to use Frobenious method at singular points only when we are given intial conditions at that singular point. It is easier to apply "y(x0)" and "y'(x0)" if our series solution is in terms of (x- x0)n.
 
Yes it looks reasonable to used frobenius series for an initial value problem because of an infinite number of terms involve.

But what about a boundary value problem where we are given two points? y(x0) = y0 and y(x1) = y1 .

We still need to sum an infinite series. :confused:
Is this what ductape meant in the initial post? Used two separate series.
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top