Question about the Frobenius method and Bessel functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Frobenius method and its application to Bessel functions, particularly focusing on the reasons behind the method's effectiveness in addressing singularities in differential equations. The original poster expresses confusion about the necessity of the factor \(x^r\) and the conditions under which the Frobenius method is applicable, especially regarding regular singular points and the behavior of solutions at those points.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the rationale behind the Frobenius method, questioning why it resolves singularity issues and under what conditions it is effective. There is discussion about the nature of solutions to differential equations with pole singularities and the behavior of Bessel functions at specific points.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between the coefficients of the differential equation and the singularities of the solutions. There is acknowledgment of the existence of two independent solutions for Bessel's equation, with one being analytic at the origin and the other exhibiting a singularity. The conversation remains open as participants continue to seek clarification on the implications of the Frobenius method and the role of the constant \(r\) in the power series.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates a beginner's level of understanding, which may influence the depth of the discussion. There are references to specific sections of a textbook for further reading, suggesting a reliance on external resources to clarify concepts.

timetraveller123
Messages
620
Reaction score
45

Homework Statement


i have been trying to learn bessel function for some time now but to not much help

firstly, i don't even understand why frobenius method works why does adding a factor of x^r help to fix the singularity problem. i saw answers on google like as not all function can be represented like negative,fractional,complex exponents and adding the r helps to take of .

secondly, why does frobenius method only work when it is regular singular point. from what i saw
##
y'' + \frac{p(x)}{x}y' + \frac{q(x)}{x^2}y = 0
##
p and q need to analytic around zero why this condition. why wouldn't frobenius work if they weren't

thirdly, from what i see in the previous equation, for such equations the second derivative is not defined at zero. but when i see bessel function(solution of one such equation) the second derivative seems to be well defined at x =0
cyl_bessel_j.png

how is it not defined .

i am sorry if i don't make sense but i am very much a begineer in these thing it would be of much help if anyone could help me out thanks

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • cyl_bessel_j.png
    cyl_bessel_j.png
    19.4 KB · Views: 855
Physics news on Phys.org
If the coefficient functions in your ode have pole singularities, then one would expect the solution may also have pole singularities, which is why you'd throw a ##x^r## out in front of a power series so that your solution can at most be a finite Laurent series. Have a look at section 10.3 of

https://archive.org/details/courseofmodernan00whit/page/197

to see why Frobenius will not give two solutions without the conditions you mentioned (the indicial equation is then at most of first order).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timetraveller123
bolbteppa said:
If the coefficient functions in your ode have pole singularities, then one would expect the solution may also have pole singularities
wait what are you saying solutions to such equations also have "problems" at that point because once again as an example the bessel function seems to behave nicely at x=0
i am really sorry if i don't make sense and i really appreciate your help thanks
and i will look through the book you said
 
timetraveller123 said:
wait what are you saying solutions to such equations also have "problems" at that point because once again as an example the bessel function seems to behave nicely at x=0
i am really sorry if i don't make sense and i really appreciate your help thanks
and i will look through the book you said

As with every second-order linear ODE, Bessel's equation has two linearly independent solutions. The J function, which is the one you have been looking at, is analytic at the origin. The other solution is the Y function, which has a singularity at the origin.
BesselY_850.gif

For this reason it is often ignored in applications.
 

Attachments

  • BesselY_850.gif
    BesselY_850.gif
    8 KB · Views: 612
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timetraveller123
oh wow thanks that clears up a lot i completely forgot about the second kind
but why does r have to be constant for every term what if the exponents in the power series of the solutions are not separated by integers
maybe what i don't understand is how does one ensure that the new r term will encompass all such functions
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K