MHB Is the Function f(z) = z^(1/3) Analytic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The function f(z) = z^(1/3) is not analytic everywhere due to the presence of a branch cut along (-∞, 0]. To determine the domain D where f is analytic, it is established that D can be defined as ℂ - {(-∞, 0]}. The discussion emphasizes that the function's continuity and the existence of partial derivatives are satisfied in this domain. The Cauchy-Riemann equations are also satisfied, confirming the function's analyticity in the specified region. Overall, f(z) is analytic in the domain excluding the branch cut and the origin.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
I want to show \(f(z) = z^{1/3}\) is analytic. I need to show that for some domain D:
(1) the partial derivatives exist in D
(2) the C-R equations are satisfied
(3) f is continuous in D
(4) the partial derivatives are continuous in D
Then f is analytic in D.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
u_x
&= \frac{x\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) +
y\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}
& \qquad
v_y &= {} \frac{x\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) +
y\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}\\
u_y
&= \frac{y\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) -
x\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}
& \qquad
v_y &= {} \frac{-y\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) +
x\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}
\end{alignat*}
Therefore, (2) is satisfied. (1) is satisfied since \(f\) is infinitely differentiable so the first partial exist. How can I determine the domain D that f is analytic in?

Is it \(\mathbb{C}-\{0\}\)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The principal branch of the function is *not* everywhere analytic.

Hint $z^{1/3} = \exp(1/2 \cdot \log(z))$, and the principal branch of log is analytic (prove it) everywhere except $z = 0$ and the branch cut $[-\infty, 0]$. $\exp(z)$ is everywhere analytic (prove it). Composition of analytic functions are analytic.
 
mathbalarka said:
The principal branch of the function is *not* everywhere analytic.

Hint $z^{1/3} = \exp(1/2 \cdot \log(z))$, and the principal branch of log is analytic (prove it) everywhere except $z = 0$ and the branch cut $[-\infty, 0]$. $\exp(z)$ is everywhere analytic (prove it). Composition of analytic functions are analytic.

I am aware that \(z^{1/3} = \exp(1/3 \cdot \ln(z)) = \exp(1/3\ln\lvert z\rvert + i(\arg(z) + 2\pi k)) = \lvert z\rvert^{1/3}e^{i/3(\arg(z) + 2\pi k)}\)

So since we have a branch cut on \((-\infty, 0]\), would we say the function is analytic on the domain \(\mathbb{C} - \{(-\infty, 0]\}\)?
 
Yes, as $\log(z)$ is analytic on that region and $\exp(z)$ is entire.
 
mathbalarka said:
Yes, as $\log(z)$ is analytic on that region and $\exp(z)$ is entire.

How can I show (3) and (4) apply on this domain D?
 
dwsmith said:
I want to show \(f(z) = z^{1/3}\) is analytic. I need to show that for some domain D:
(1) the partial derivatives exist in D
(2) the C-R equations are satisfied
(3) f is continuous in D
(4) the partial derivatives are continuous in D
Then f is analytic in D.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
u_x
&= \frac{x\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) +
y\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}
& \qquad
v_y &= {} \frac{x\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) +
y\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}\\
u_y
&= \frac{y\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) -
x\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}
& \qquad
v_y &= {} \frac{-y\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) +
x\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}
\end{alignat*}
Therefore, (2) is satisfied. (1) is satisfied since \(f\) is infinitely differentiable so the first partial exist. How can I determine the domain D that f is analytic in?

Is it \(\mathbb{C}-\{0\}\)?

If a function is analytic, doesn't that mean you can write it as a series that is convergent over a neighbourhood?

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} z^{\frac{1}{3}} = \left[ 1 + \left( z - 1 \right) \right] ^{\frac{1}{3}} \end{align*}$

and you can apply the Binomial series expansion.
 
dwsmith said:
How can I show (3) and (4) apply on this domain D?

Well, it is clear that $\log(z)$ (the principal branch) is not continuous at $(-\infty, 0]$ (arg(z) is not continuous there) and thus is not analytic. Transform the C-R equations into polar coordinates as $(x, y) \mapsto (r\sin(\theta), r\cos(\theta))$ and set $z = x + iy$. The calculations are quite straightforward.
 
Prove It said:
If a function is analytic, doesn't that mean you can write it as a series that is convergent over a neighbourhood?

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} z^{\frac{1}{3}} = \left[ 1 + \left( z - 1 \right) \right] ^{\frac{1}{3}} \end{align*}$

and you can apply the Binomial series expansion.

I don't see how we can write that as a power series.
 
mathbalarka said:
Well, it is clear that $\log(z)$ (the principal branch) is not continuous at $(-\infty, 0]$ (arg(z) is not continuous there) and thus is not analytic. Transform the C-R equations into polar coordinates as $(x, y) \mapsto (r\sin(\theta), r\cos(\theta))$ and set $z = x + iy$. The calculations are quite straightforward.
\[
u_x = v_y = \frac{\cos(2/3\cdot\theta)}{3r^{2/3}}\\
u_y = -v_x = \frac{\sin(2/3\cdot\theta)}{3r^{2/3}}
\]
So the partial derivatives aren't continuous at the origin.
 
  • #10
We have already excluded out the branch cut at $(-\infty, 0]$. $z^{1/3}$ is not analytic in any region encircling $0$, in particular.
 
  • #11
mathbalarka said:
We have already excluded out the branch cut at $(-\infty, 0]$. $z^{1/3}$ is not analytic in any region encircling $0$, in particular.

That is the information learned from your suggestion on polar coordinates though.
 
  • #12
dwsmith said:
I don't see how we can write that as a power series.

Can't you? Look up the Binomial Series.

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( 1 + x \right) ^{\alpha} = \sum_{k = 0}^{\infty}{ {\alpha \choose{k}} x^k } \end{align*}$

where $\displaystyle \begin{align*} { \alpha \choose{k}} = \frac{ \alpha \left( \alpha - 1 \right) \left( \alpha - 2 \right) \dots \left( \alpha - k + 1 \right) }{k!} \end{align*}$

In this case, $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x = z - 1 \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \alpha = \frac{1}{3} \end{align*}$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
340
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K