Is the Function f(z) = z^(1/3) Analytic?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the analyticity of the function \(f(z) = z^{1/3}\). Participants explore the conditions under which this function can be considered analytic, including the existence of partial derivatives, satisfaction of the Cauchy-Riemann equations, and continuity in a specified domain. The conversation involves theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning regarding the function's behavior in complex analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that to show \(f(z) = z^{1/3}\) is analytic, one must demonstrate the existence of partial derivatives, satisfaction of the C-R equations, continuity, and continuity of partial derivatives in a domain \(D\).
  • Others argue that the principal branch of the function is not everywhere analytic due to the branch cut at \((- \infty, 0]\) and the point \(z = 0\), suggesting that \(f(z)\) is analytic on the domain \(\mathbb{C} - \{(-\infty, 0]\}\).
  • A later reply questions how to show continuity and the continuity of partial derivatives in the proposed domain \(D\).
  • Some participants discuss the implications of analyticity, suggesting that if a function is analytic, it can be expressed as a convergent power series in a neighborhood, raising questions about the applicability of the Binomial series expansion to \(f(z)\).
  • Concerns are raised about the continuity of \(\log(z)\) at the branch cut and its implications for the analyticity of \(f(z)\).
  • Participants explore transformations into polar coordinates to analyze the C-R equations, noting that the partial derivatives may not be continuous at the origin.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the conditions under which \(f(z) = z^{1/3}\) is analytic. While some suggest it is analytic in \(\mathbb{C} - \{(-\infty, 0]\}\), others point out that it is not analytic in any region encircling \(0\), indicating unresolved debate regarding the function's analyticity.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of analyticity and continuity, as well as unresolved mathematical steps regarding the application of the Binomial series expansion to \(f(z)\).

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
I want to show \(f(z) = z^{1/3}\) is analytic. I need to show that for some domain D:
(1) the partial derivatives exist in D
(2) the C-R equations are satisfied
(3) f is continuous in D
(4) the partial derivatives are continuous in D
Then f is analytic in D.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
u_x
&= \frac{x\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) +
y\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}
& \qquad
v_y &= {} \frac{x\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) +
y\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}\\
u_y
&= \frac{y\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) -
x\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}
& \qquad
v_y &= {} \frac{-y\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) +
x\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}
\end{alignat*}
Therefore, (2) is satisfied. (1) is satisfied since \(f\) is infinitely differentiable so the first partial exist. How can I determine the domain D that f is analytic in?

Is it \(\mathbb{C}-\{0\}\)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The principal branch of the function is *not* everywhere analytic.

Hint $z^{1/3} = \exp(1/2 \cdot \log(z))$, and the principal branch of log is analytic (prove it) everywhere except $z = 0$ and the branch cut $[-\infty, 0]$. $\exp(z)$ is everywhere analytic (prove it). Composition of analytic functions are analytic.
 
mathbalarka said:
The principal branch of the function is *not* everywhere analytic.

Hint $z^{1/3} = \exp(1/2 \cdot \log(z))$, and the principal branch of log is analytic (prove it) everywhere except $z = 0$ and the branch cut $[-\infty, 0]$. $\exp(z)$ is everywhere analytic (prove it). Composition of analytic functions are analytic.

I am aware that \(z^{1/3} = \exp(1/3 \cdot \ln(z)) = \exp(1/3\ln\lvert z\rvert + i(\arg(z) + 2\pi k)) = \lvert z\rvert^{1/3}e^{i/3(\arg(z) + 2\pi k)}\)

So since we have a branch cut on \((-\infty, 0]\), would we say the function is analytic on the domain \(\mathbb{C} - \{(-\infty, 0]\}\)?
 
Yes, as $\log(z)$ is analytic on that region and $\exp(z)$ is entire.
 
mathbalarka said:
Yes, as $\log(z)$ is analytic on that region and $\exp(z)$ is entire.

How can I show (3) and (4) apply on this domain D?
 
dwsmith said:
I want to show \(f(z) = z^{1/3}\) is analytic. I need to show that for some domain D:
(1) the partial derivatives exist in D
(2) the C-R equations are satisfied
(3) f is continuous in D
(4) the partial derivatives are continuous in D
Then f is analytic in D.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
u_x
&= \frac{x\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) +
y\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}
& \qquad
v_y &= {} \frac{x\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) +
y\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}\\
u_y
&= \frac{y\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) -
x\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}
& \qquad
v_y &= {} \frac{-y\cos\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big) +
x\sin\Big(\frac{1}{3}\arctan\big(\frac{y}{x}\big)\Big)}
{3(x^2 + y^2)^{5/6}}
\end{alignat*}
Therefore, (2) is satisfied. (1) is satisfied since \(f\) is infinitely differentiable so the first partial exist. How can I determine the domain D that f is analytic in?

Is it \(\mathbb{C}-\{0\}\)?

If a function is analytic, doesn't that mean you can write it as a series that is convergent over a neighbourhood?

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} z^{\frac{1}{3}} = \left[ 1 + \left( z - 1 \right) \right] ^{\frac{1}{3}} \end{align*}$

and you can apply the Binomial series expansion.
 
dwsmith said:
How can I show (3) and (4) apply on this domain D?

Well, it is clear that $\log(z)$ (the principal branch) is not continuous at $(-\infty, 0]$ (arg(z) is not continuous there) and thus is not analytic. Transform the C-R equations into polar coordinates as $(x, y) \mapsto (r\sin(\theta), r\cos(\theta))$ and set $z = x + iy$. The calculations are quite straightforward.
 
Prove It said:
If a function is analytic, doesn't that mean you can write it as a series that is convergent over a neighbourhood?

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} z^{\frac{1}{3}} = \left[ 1 + \left( z - 1 \right) \right] ^{\frac{1}{3}} \end{align*}$

and you can apply the Binomial series expansion.

I don't see how we can write that as a power series.
 
mathbalarka said:
Well, it is clear that $\log(z)$ (the principal branch) is not continuous at $(-\infty, 0]$ (arg(z) is not continuous there) and thus is not analytic. Transform the C-R equations into polar coordinates as $(x, y) \mapsto (r\sin(\theta), r\cos(\theta))$ and set $z = x + iy$. The calculations are quite straightforward.
\[
u_x = v_y = \frac{\cos(2/3\cdot\theta)}{3r^{2/3}}\\
u_y = -v_x = \frac{\sin(2/3\cdot\theta)}{3r^{2/3}}
\]
So the partial derivatives aren't continuous at the origin.
 
  • #10
We have already excluded out the branch cut at $(-\infty, 0]$. $z^{1/3}$ is not analytic in any region encircling $0$, in particular.
 
  • #11
mathbalarka said:
We have already excluded out the branch cut at $(-\infty, 0]$. $z^{1/3}$ is not analytic in any region encircling $0$, in particular.

That is the information learned from your suggestion on polar coordinates though.
 
  • #12
dwsmith said:
I don't see how we can write that as a power series.

Can't you? Look up the Binomial Series.

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( 1 + x \right) ^{\alpha} = \sum_{k = 0}^{\infty}{ {\alpha \choose{k}} x^k } \end{align*}$

where $\displaystyle \begin{align*} { \alpha \choose{k}} = \frac{ \alpha \left( \alpha - 1 \right) \left( \alpha - 2 \right) \dots \left( \alpha - k + 1 \right) }{k!} \end{align*}$

In this case, $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x = z - 1 \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \alpha = \frac{1}{3} \end{align*}$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K