Is the Future of Physics Limited Compared to Advancements in Other Sciences?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fizziks_Fan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Future Physics
AI Thread Summary
Physics is viewed as a fundamental science, yet some believe much of it has already been discovered, leaving mainly applications in engineering. However, historical perspectives suggest that significant breakthroughs, such as radioactivity, can still emerge unexpectedly. Current discussions highlight ongoing research in physics, including string theory and unexplained phenomena like the properties of water. Comparatively, biology is seen as having vast potential for advancements, particularly in genetics and cancer research. The conversation emphasizes that physics remains a dynamic field with opportunities for new discoveries.
Fizziks_Fan
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I love physics more than any other science because it is so fundamental and true. However, it seems as though much of physics has already been discovered and all that remains is to apply those principles in engineering and such. On the other hand, I can see a lot of potential in biology as there is a lot of research still able to be done in genetics, finding a cure to cancer, etc.

So I guess my question comes down to this:

-What research is currently going on for physicists?
-Do you see as much potential in advancement of physics compared to other sciences like biotech?

Thanks for taking the time to address a high school kid's questions. :-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fizziks_Fan said:
it seems as though much of physics has already been discovered and all that remains is to apply those principles in engineering and such.

That's what people were saying in the late 1800s, before radioactivity was discovered.
 
Fizziks_Fan said:
I love physics more than any other science because it is so fundamental and true. However, it seems as though much of physics has already been discovered and all that remains is to apply those principles in engineering and such.

You have got to be kidding me!

Zz.
 
I think it's all that unfortunate "we might be close to a theory of everything" stuff.

Fizziks, I understand. When I was in high school, jaded by the utter worthlessness of my "advanced" physics course, I read a new book written by Brian Greene called "The Elegant Universe." To my amazement, it seemed physicists had cracked all the forces of the universe and all the constituents of matter and energy, except for this one last thing that would bring it all together called string theory. I also read books by the likes of Paul Davies about "the end of physics," and in my high school honors class we debated "the end of science," as much as could be done by such an amateurish group.

Back then, it honestly seemed like physical science didn't need me. Why else, especially, would the classes be so boring, if it hadn't all been figured out?

We still don't even understand some of the properties of water.
 
Last edited:
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top