Is the given force equation conservative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Calpalned
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether a given force equation, specifically for a spring described by the force law ## \vec F= (-kx + ax^3 +bx^4)\vec i##, is conservative. Participants explore the definitions and characteristics of conservative forces in the context of this problem.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the relationship between the force's dependence on position and its conservativeness. There are attempts to clarify the definitions of conservative forces and the conditions under which they can be identified. Questions arise regarding the implications of the integral notation used in the context of conservative forces and potential energy.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide clarifications on the definitions of conservative forces and the mathematical conditions that must be satisfied. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these definitions, particularly in relation to the potential energy function derived from the force.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves a specific force law and that the second part of the question requires finding the potential energy function, which adds complexity to the discussion. There is also mention of the arbitrary nature of defining the zero point for potential energy.

Calpalned
Messages
297
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A particular spring obeys the force law ## \vec F= (-kx + ax^3 +bx^4)\vec i##. Is this force conservative? Explain why or why not.

Homework Equations


Conservative forces depend on the beginning and endpoints, but not the path taken.

The Attempt at a Solution


The given equation for force clearly depends on ##x##, which is distance. Therefore, this force is non-conservative. Additionally, if ##\vec F## depends on ##x##, then the graph of F vs dl will vary depending on what value of ##x## is plugged in. Work (which is change in energy) will not be constant, so once again force is not conserved. My answer is incorrect, according to my solutions guide. Where did I mess up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's where you messed up:
Calpalned said:
Conservative forces depend on the beginning and endpoints, but not the path taken.
This is wrong. Conservative forces are forces that their work on a particle in moving it from one point to another, doesn't depend on the path taken and only depends on the two points. This is equivalent to saying that a force is conservative if and only if ## \oint \vec F \cdot \vec{dl}=0 ## for all closed paths. It can be proved that this is equivalent to ## \vec \nabla \times \vec F=0 ##. So the latter equation is a good way of finding out whether a force field is conservative or not.
 
Shyan said:
Here's where you messed up:

This is wrong. Conservative forces are forces that their work on a particle in moving it from one point to another, doesn't depend on the path taken and only depends on the two points. This is equivalent to saying that a force is conservative if and only if ## \oint \vec F \cdot \vec{dl}=0 ## for all closed paths. It can be proved that this is equivalent to ## \vec \nabla \times \vec F=0 ##. So the latter equation is a good way of finding out whether a force field is conservative or not.
What does the symbol integral with circle mean?

The second part of the question asks me to find the potential energy function, which is the integral of ## \vec F ##. If force is conservative, then the potential energy function is equal to zero right?
 
Calpalned said:
What does the symbol integral with circle mean?
It means the line integral is taken over a closed path.
Calpalned said:
The second part of the question asks me to find the potential energy function, which is the integral of ##\vec F## . If force is conservative, then the potential energy function is equal to zero right?
No. To obtain the potential energy from the force field, you should use ## \phi(\vec r)=-\int_{\vec{r}_{ref}}^{\vec r} \vec F \cdot \vec{dl} ## where ## \phi(\vec r _{ref}) ## is defined to be zero, i.e. the point where potential becomes zero is arbitrary.
 
In one dimension (as it is this case) a force ##\vec{F}## is conservative if and only if there is a function ##\phi(x)## such that ##\vec{F} = -\frac{d}{dx}\phi(x) \vec{i}##

In your example the force is a continuous function of the position ##x## so the above is satisfied (i.e. the force is conservative).
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K