News Is the GOP Poised to Gain Control of the US Senate in 2014?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the GOP's potential to gain control of the U.S. Senate in the upcoming midterm elections. With 21 Democratic seats and 15 Republican seats up for grabs, Republicans need to secure six additional seats to achieve a majority. Key points include that 15 of the Democratic seats are in states where the President's approval ratings are low, making them vulnerable. Notable races include Kentucky, where Mitch McConnell faces a strong challenge, and South Dakota, where the Democratic candidate is relatively unknown. The conversation also touches on the influence of outside spending in elections, the impact of incumbents retiring, and the significance of recent political events, such as the censure of John McCain by Arizona Republicans. Additionally, the discussion highlights the overall dissatisfaction with Congress and President Obama, which may affect voter sentiment. The thread concludes with observations about the unpredictability of elections and the potential for unexpected outcomes, as seen in recent primary results.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,340
Reaction score
7,138
The big question is whether or not the GOP can gain control of the US Senate.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/27/us/politics/2014-elections-likely-to-keep-capitals-split.html

. . . .
The election is still 10 months away, and a major misstep by either party or an unexpected outside event could quickly shift the narrative of a campaign season that is likely to set records for midterm spending by outside groups seeking to influence the outcome without disclosing the sources behind their cash.
. . . .
Some incumbents are retiring.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Democrats have 21 seats to defend, and the Republicans have 15. The Republicans have to pick up 6 seats to gain control of the Senate.

Of the 21, 15 are in states where the President is polling below 50%. The Democrats therefore have to keep 10 of them - the other 6 are pretty safe. Some of those seats are more secure than others. For example, Tom Udall is wildly popular in New Mexico, even though the President is not. South Dakota, on the other hand, will be tough. Tim Johnson is retiring, and Stephanie Herseth is not running. The only other candidates who have won statewide elections are on the GOP side. (Indeed, the leading Democratic candidate, Rick Weiland, has never won an election)
 
McCain Censure the Latest Sign of GOP Fratricide
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/mccain-censure-latest-sign-gop-194100763.html
. . .
In a move both bizarre and ill-timed, Arizona Republican Party members voted to censure Sen. John McCain – a highly-decorated Vietnam War hero, maverick conservative and 2008 Republican presidential nominee – for being too liberal for their taste.
. . . .
We live in interesting times.
 
Astronuc said:
Ted Nugent ...
is relevant how to the thread?
 
Ted Nugent was nutty 40 years ago, and hasn't improved with time. He's also never held a public office - unlike, say James Trafficant, who is off the scale.

But how is this relevant to this year's election?
 
mheslep said:
is relevant how to the thread?

Vanadium 50 said:
Ted Nugent was nutty 40 years ago, and hasn't improved with time. He's also never held a public office - unlike, say James Trafficant, who is off the scale.

But how is this relevant to this year's election?
Gubernatorial elections can influence Congressional elections, and I'm curious how this will affect Texas congressional elections, particularly those of folks like Steve Stockman, who has close ties with Nugent.

Stockman, who invited Nugent to the State of the Union address, has decided to challenge John Cornyn for the US Senate. Apparently, there is a wide field of challengers for Cornyn's seat. Abbott declined to run for the Senate.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Ted Nugent was nutty 40 years ago, and hasn't improved with time. He's also never held a public office - unlike, say James Trafficant, who is off the scale.

But how is this relevant to this year's election?
C'mon, when a rich or famous Republican says something nutty, it's always news! Didn't you know that?!?
 
Seven Senate races to watch:

Kentucky: "McConnell is expected to win the primary, but he faces a tough general election challenger, Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes, Kentucky's Secretary of State."

Arkansas: Mark Pryor faces GOP challenger, Rep. Tom Cotton.

North Carolina: "Five GOP candidates are vying for the chance to challenge the Democratic incumbent, Kay Hagen. The most prominent Republican in the race is State House Speaker Thom Tillis, . . . "

Georgia: "Democratic candidate, Michelle Nunn, daughter of former Georgia Sen. Sam Nunn, is enjoying a steady lead among the eight Republican candidates -- including Reps. Phil Gingrey, Jack Kingston and Paul Broun and former Georgia Secretary of State Karen Handel. "

Iowa: Democratic Rep. Bruce Braley and Republican Mark Jacobs are seeking the seat held by retiring Senator Tom Harkin.

Louisiana: "Sen. Mary Landrieu is nearly tied with her main Republican challenger, Rep. Bill Cassidy. "

Alaska: Democratic Sen. Mark Begich faces GOP challenger, Dan Sullivan, former Natural Resources Commissioner.


http://news.yahoo.com/tidal-wave-money-could-decide-111500312.html
 
  • #10
Astronuc said:
Seven Senate races to watch:

Kentucky: "McConnell is expected to win the primary, but he faces a tough general election challenger, Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes, Kentucky's Secretary of State."
http://news.yahoo.com/tidal-wave-money-could-decide-111500312.html

This is somewhat interesting.

I found the following in an article alleging Rand Paul has emerged as the GOP Presidential frontrunner:

"McConnell, meanwhile, has gotten tea-party validation to get him through a contested primary against businessman Matt Bevin. He's also benefited from Paul's swipes at former President Clinton, who is emerging as an important surrogate for McConnell's Democratic challenger, Alison Lundergan Grimes. McConnell, if he survives the general election, could become the next majority leader."

http://www.nationaljournal.com/agai...op-s-early-presidential-front-runner-20140225
 
  • #11
That story doesn't give any numbers to support its assertion. Each poll has a different answer. CNN has Paul ahead, PPP - Huckabee, WaPo-ABC -Paul Ryan. Jeb Bush, Christie close in all them.
 
  • #12
Vanadium 50 said:
Ted Nugent was nutty 40 years ago, and hasn't improved with time. He's also never held a public office - unlike, say James Trafficant, who is off the scale.

But how is this relevant to this year's election?

So here's a mind-boggler:

attachment.php?attachmentid=67064&d=1393463485.jpg


CNN is currently featuring seven, count 'em, seven Ted Nugent articles/videos/photo arrays under a big headline asking if he's the voice of America/the Republican party. Seriously, CNN?

Yeah, that's how relevant they want him to be.
 

Attachments

  • ted.jpg
    ted.jpg
    46.6 KB · Views: 600
  • #13
russ_watters said:
CNN is currently featuring seven, count 'em, seven Ted Nugent articles/videos/photo arrays under a big headline asking if he's the voice of America/the Republican party. Seriously, CNN?

Yeah, that's how relevant they want him to be.

I think it's safe to say Ted Nugent pushes CNN's buttons! Yes, the coverage of this is over-the-top.

For the record, I think Nugent is a flaming idiot. I wonder if repeated exposure to loud, poor-quality rock music can cause traumatic brain injury?
 
  • #14
russ_watters said:
... Seriously, CNN?

I don't get it. Something has to give. Their ratings are on par with the guy playing for change on the street corner and still falling:

CNN lost 39% of its total primetime audience from the same month in 2013, and 35% of its primetime audience

Couple decades ago, in a situation like this the execs would have been quickly fired, the air-talent all turned over. What's wrong with Turner/Time Warner? Either they act or some oil emirate will.
 
  • #15
They just dropped Piers Morgan's show. Looks like "Message received."
 
  • #16
lisab said:
I think it's safe to say Ted Nugent pushes CNN's buttons! Yes, the coverage of this is over-the-top.

For the record, I think Nugent is a flaming idiot. I wonder if repeated exposure to loud, poor-quality rock music can cause traumatic brain injury?
++++1
 
  • #17
Vanadium 50 said:
The Democrats have 21 seats to defend, and the Republicans have 15. The Republicans have to pick up 6 seats to gain control of the Senate.

Of the 21, 15 are in states where the President is polling below 50%. The Democrats therefore have to keep 10 of them - the other 6 are pretty safe. Some of those seats are more secure than others. For example, Tom Udall is wildly popular in New Mexico, even though the President is not. South Dakota, on the other hand, will be tough. Tim Johnson is retiring, and Stephanie Herseth is not running. The only other candidates who have won statewide elections are on the GOP side. (Indeed, the leading Democratic candidate, Rick Weiland, has never won an election)

Is the president's approval rating all that important considering that the approval rating of congress is only 13%.:eek:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/166838/congress-job-approval-starts-2014.aspx
 
  • #18
edward said:
Is the president's approval rating all that important considering that the approval rating of congress is only 13%.:eek:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/166838/congress-job-approval-starts-2014.aspx

If the approval rating of congress as a whole was important in elections, there would be almost no incumbents re-elected. But the congress doesn't run as a whole in the elections.

This is a situation where the voter thinks, "It's my guy in congress who is OK; the rest of these jerks need to go."
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #19
Astronuc said:
We live in interesting times.

Yes we do.
 
  • #21
lisab said:
Whoa! The second-in-command in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, Eric Cantor (R-VA), just lost his primary race to a Tea Party candidate!

http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2...he_south_carolina_and_virginia_primaries.html

Now, I don't follow Virginia politics, but I sure didn't see this coming.

I'm sure Rep. Cantor didn't either. He reportedly had polls which showed him with a huge lead and by all indications was expecting to cruise to another term. TITANIC, meet Iceberg.
 
  • #22
  • #23
Just heard the position of majority leader was first created in the 1890's. Since then, an incumbent has never lost the seat in a primary.
 
  • #24
Montana Democrats choose new Senate candidate
http://news.yahoo.com/montana-democrats-choose-senate-candidate-143832739--election.html
HELENA, Mont. (AP) — Montana Democrats on Saturday selected a little-known state lawmaker named Amanda Curtis as their candidate for U.S. Senate after Sen. John Walsh dropped out amid plagiarism allegations from his time at the U.S. Army War College.

A math teacher! Excellent!

We need more math and science teachers in Congress - or at least, some folks with critical thinking. :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #25
Another independent candidate - from Kansas!

Orman has been described as a political enigma, which seems like a nice way of saying he doesn't seem to know very much. A onetime college Republican and short-lived Democratic politician (he ran for the Senate briefly in 2008 before dropping out), he's telegenic, wealthy and elusive. His central pitch is that both parties are "more interested in political games than problem-solving" and Washington is a "mess," and other evocative stuff like that.

I was having a nice, upbeat email exchange about a possible interview this week with Orman's press secretary, one Sam Edelen, until I mentioned that I planned to ask the candidate for his thoughts on some of the important issues of the day and where they might put him on the ideological spectrum. Edelen instantly went dark. I'm still waiting for a reply.
It would be nice to know where a candidate stands on various issues. Health care/insurance seems to be a key issue, as is immigration, etc.

. . . Orman probably also supports curing Ebola, ending terrorism and educating children. You can see how this differentiates him from those career politicians.
The second sentence is an interesting comment.

Another interesting observation by the author Matt Bai.
Standing outside the dysfunctional two-party system can earn you some credibility with voters at home (and with those of us who disdain the idea of party fealty generally), but it doesn't always buy you influence in an institution dominated by partisan blocs.
 
  • #26
5 things to watch in Senate races Tuesday night
http://news.yahoo.com/5-things-watch-senate-races-tuesday-night-065555271--election.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #27
Why can't you guys just hold your elections all in one day like civilized societies do, instead of torturing yourselves incessantly?
 
  • #28
In the US,

Vote today - because

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

and

". . . and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep
  • #29
The last poll had Walker by 7pts. I think in the end Burke will make it even closer, but Walker still wins for WI.
 
  • #30
Greg Bernhardt said:
The last poll had Walker by 7pts. I think in the end Burke will make it even closer, but Walker still wins for WI.

By 6 points.

Astronuc said:
Seven Senate races to watch:
  1. Kentucky
  2. Arkansas
  3. North Carolina
  4. Georgia
  5. Iowa
  6. Louisiana
  7. Alaska

The first 5 went Republican (although NC is sufficiently close that early newsbites were forecasting a win by Hagan). Alaska has the Republican, Dan Sullivan, up by 4 points, but the Democrat, Mark Begich has not conceded, as there are a number of questioned ballots. Louisiana has 42% to Democratic incumbent Mary Landreiu, 41% to Republican Bill Cassidy, and 13% to Republican Rob Maness. This will go to a runoff in December. Maness is to the right of Cassidy, so it is not likely Landrieu will pick up many of his supporters.

I was surprised by the GOP margin in this election, which was typically about 6% above what the polls predicted. For example, all but one poll was showing Joni Ernst tied or a point ahead of Braley - she finished 8.5% ahead of him. Pat Quinn was a point or two ahead of Bruce Rauner in the Illinois governor's race - but he lost by 5%. Michelle Nunn was even or slightly ahead of David Perdue, but ended up 8% behind. What makes this more amazing is that just before the election the media was questioning whether the polls were biased in the other direction and that the Democrats would do substantially better than predicted.

In my opinion, there were two unforced errors by senior Democrats that hurt them in this election. The first was Harry Reid's policy of not bringing controversial votes to the Senate floor if he didn't already have a majority. This would have worked had the President been more popular, but given that 85% of the votes were confirmations, it allowed the Republicans to say of their opponents, "(s)he voted 99% of the time with the President." The other was President Obama's comment about those Democrats running in purple or red states as independent voices: "The Bottom Line Is Though, These Are All Folks Who Vote With Me, They Have Supported My Agenda…". Not only did this undermine their messages, saying this two weeks before the election was just about the worst possible timing.
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep
  • #31
Some Oregon local issues:

Yes to pot, No to illegals and GMO labeling.
The GMO battle was unreal with the amount of money spent on both side for ads in this state. It also failed in CO.

Allows possession, manufacture, sale of marijuana by/to adults, subject to state licensing, regulation, taxation Votes Percent _________________ _________________
Yes Votes
715,180 54.79%
No Votes
590,197 45.21%_________________ _________________

Totals: 1,305,377 100%

Provides Oregon resident "driver card" without requiring proof of legal presence in the United States Votes Percent _________________ _________________
Yes Votes
419,934 32.58%
No Votes
868,883 67.42%_________________ _________________

Totals: 1,288,817 100%

Requires food manufacturers, retailers to label "genetically engineered" foods as such; state, citizens may enforce Votes Percent _________________ _________________
Yes Votes
637,481 48.98%
No Votes
663,954 51.02%_________________ _________________

Totals: 1,301,435 100%
http://oregonvotes.gov/results/2014G/1415319963.html
 
  • #32
After A Resounding GOP Victory, 6 Tidbits That Tell The Story
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way...ing-gop-victory-5-tidbits-that-tell-the-story
"Just two years after Mr. Obama's re-election, the midterm results underscored just how far he has fallen in the public mind. Nearly six out of 10 voters on Tuesday expressed negative feelings about his administration, according to exit polls. For every two voters who said they had cast ballots to support Mr. Obama, three said they were voting to express their opposition to him.
"The electorate was deeply pessimistic about the country, with seven out of 10 describing the economy as not so good or poor and eight out of 10 expressing worry about the direction of the economy in the next year.
"Numbers like that discouraged Mr. Obama's aides, who said they had not done a good job getting out the president's record, noting that the deficit has fallen by half, unemployment is now below 6 percent, the price of gasoline has fallen sharply and the economy is growing at a decent rate."
An unhappy electorate is toughest on Obama and the Democrats
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...9884a6-6465-11e4-9fdc-d43b053ecb4d_story.html
Exit polls Tuesday portrayed an electorate that, while disgruntled, was not quite as Republican in its leaning as it was four years ago, when a tidal wave of dissatisfaction gave the GOP a historic victory. But if Democrats thought that might save them, their expectations proved groundless.

Midterm Election Exit Poll: 7 Reasons Why Americans Are More Pessimistic Than Ever
https://gma.yahoo.com/midterm-election-exit-poll-7-reasons-why-americans-033502473--abc-news-topstories.html
 
Last edited:
  • #33
Those aides are not helping the President or his party. "The people are wrong to be unhappy" is on the one hand, incredibly patronizing, and on the other not likely to convince voters that the President or his party will change direction from the one they are unhappy with.
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep
  • #34
Vanadium 50 said:
Those aides are not helping the President or his party. "The people are wrong to be unhappy" is on the one hand, incredibly patronizing, and on the other not likely to convince voters that the President or his party will change direction from the one they are unhappy with.
That's what yes-men are for: the boss is perfect, so if something bad happens it must have been my fault for not executing the boss's plan properly...or in this case, for not effectively educating the public on how perfect he is.
 
  • #35
You can see that the President's allies writing in The Nation and TNR are hopping mad - at the voters. How dare they not buy what we are selling! I'm sure the President reads this and thinks of Warren G. Harding: "I have no trouble with my enemies. I can take care of my enemies in a fight. But my friends, my god---n friends, they're the ones who keep me walking the floor at nights!"
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc and mheslep
  • #36
Vanadium 50 said:
Those aides are not helping the President or his party. "The people are wrong to be unhappy" is on the one hand, incredibly patronizing, and on the other not likely to convince voters that the President or his party will change direction from the one they are unhappy with.

A lot like the dissatisfaction which the government of the DDR (East Germany) felt after the uprising of 17 June 1953, as expressed in a Brecht poem:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Lösung

The Solution

After the uprising of the 17th of June
The Secretary of the Writers' Union
Had leaflets distributed in the Stalinallee
Stating that the people
Had forfeited the confidence of the government
And could win it back only
By redoubled efforts. Would it not be easier
In that case for the government
To dissolve the people
And elect another?
 
  • Like
Likes Danger

Similar threads

News Did Sarah Palin cost the GOP control of the Senate?
Replies
33
Views
5K
News Bush Honest & Trustworthy Until How Many Lies?
2
Replies
65
Views
10K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top