Is the Hawking vs. Sussking debate still unresolved?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bostonnew
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hawking
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the ongoing debate regarding the fate of information in black holes, specifically whether information is lost when black holes evaporate or if it is somehow restored. Participants explore various theoretical perspectives, including the implications of block time and the nature of information itself.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about whether information is lost when black holes disappear, noting that it is not yet known.
  • One participant mentions that the prevailing belief is that information is somehow restored, referencing various approaches to the black hole information paradox.
  • Another participant proposes that microphysical degrees of freedom may store information, suggesting that quantum corrections during black hole evaporation could restore it, though these corrections may not be small.
  • Questions arise regarding the nature of information, particularly in the context of block time, with participants exploring what information means under different assumptions about time.
  • One participant discusses the implications of an infinite universe containing all possible states, leading to a conclusion that the total amount of information might be zero if everything derives from equations.
  • Another participant challenges the idea that information does not exist if it does not flow from the past to the future, suggesting that information can still be present in a static solution.
  • There is a discussion about the option that information is encoded in correlations between future and past, which some participants argue does not require information to leak from the black hole.
  • Participants engage in a philosophical exploration of what constitutes information, using examples such as the set of all primes and static sentences.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the fate of information in black holes, with multiple competing views and ongoing uncertainties regarding the implications of block time and the nature of information itself.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the implications of quantum corrections and the definitions of information, particularly in relation to different models of time.

bostonnew
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I've been reading about it various places online, but I can't seem to find a straight answer.

Is information lost when black holes disappear, or not?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The basic idea is that there are microphysical degrees of freedom storing the information and from which quantum corrections during black hole evaporation will again restore the information (quantum corrections mean that the spectrum is not purely black body).

The problem seems to be that these quantum corrections cannot be small.
 
Where can I get more details about "Information is encoded in the correlations between future and past" solution?
 
Dmitry67 said:
Where can I get more details about "Information is encoded in the correlations between future and past" solution?
In reference [7] cited there on the wikipedia page.
For a simplified explanation see also
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/0912.1938
 
Thank you
OMG, Just noticed who is the author :)

But it puzzled me even more... What is a the INFORMATION if we assume block time?
 
Dmitry67 said:
OMG, Just noticed who is the author :)
Well, if that particular author is not sufficiently impressive, you may also see Ref. [6] by James Hartle. :wink:

Dmitry67 said:
But it puzzled me even more... What is a the INFORMATION if we assume block time?
I'm not sure that I understand the question, so I will respond with a counter-question: What is information if we DON'T assume block time?
 
I have to be honest, the more I think about it the less I understand what is it.
For example, after reading the recent article http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.1066 by Max Tegmark and his (very logical) view that truly infinite universe must contain all possible states (with different frequences) I have to conclude that the total amount of information in such universe is ZERO because everything is derived from the equations.

Answering your question, without block time, Universe is truly evolving, and can be emulated. Then the emulator calculates state at t+dt based on the state at t. The information is the information the emulator must keep to simulate the evolution correctly. This is naive, but very general definition, because it is applicable to any mathematical universe, including, for example, the "Game of Life" universe.

However, if we assume block time, there is no 'flow' and no information to pass from the past into the future; everything is just a static solution, and time is just a direction.
 
Last edited:
Dmitry67 said:
However, if we assume block time, there is no 'flow' and no information to pass from the past into the future; everything is just a static solution, and time is just a direction.
If information does not flow from the past to the future, it does not mean that information does not exist.
 
  • #10
tom.stoer said:
The problem seems to be that these quantum corrections cannot be small.
Exactly. And at the same time, they SHOULD be small for macroscopically large black holes.

But the option "information is encoded in the correlations between future and past" (that Dmitry asked about) does not suffer from this problem because, for this option to work, no information needs to leak out from the black hole.
 
  • #11
ok, regarding static objects, what information is stored in a set of all primes?
 
  • #12
Dmitry67 said:
ok, regarding static objects, what information is stored in a set of all primes?
For the same reason as before, I will again respond with a counter-question:
What information is stored in the static sentence:
"Any fool can ask a question, but only clever person can ask a good one." ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
10K