Is the Inverse Element in Modular Arithmetic Unique?

alphamu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Question: Let n be a positive integer and consider x,y,z to be elements of Zn. Prove that if x . y = 1 and x . z = 1, then y = z. (Since working in Zn the sign '.' means "multiplication modulo n".)

Conclude that if x has an inverse element in Zn, then the inverse element is unique.

Attempt: Well if x . y = 1 then this means that xy = n + 1 since were working in Zn. This means the same can be said about y . z = 1 that yz = n + 1. This suggests that z = x by substitution. I'm not sure of this is correct or if I'm going down right path here.

Other thing I thought about was multiplying x . y = 1 by z on both sides to prove y=z but I'm a bit stuck.

I'm also a bit confused about the last bit of the question where I have to conclude if x has inverse element (not entirely sure what this is) in Zn then the inverse element is unique.

Can anyone help please?Sent from my iPhone using Physics Forums
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alphamu said:
Question: Let n be a positive integer and consider x,y,z to be elements of Zn. Prove that if x . y = 1 and x . z = 1, then y = z. (Since working in Zn the sign '.' means "multiplication modulo n".)

Conclude that if x has an inverse element in Zn, then the inverse element is unique.

Attempt: Well if x . y = 1 then this means that xy = n + 1 since were working in Zn. This means the same can be said about y . z = 1 that yz = n + 1.
This is NOT true. for example, 5*5= 1 (mod 12) because 5*5= 2(12+ 1). That is, 2n+ 1, NOT n+ 1.

This suggests that z = x by substitution. I'm not sure of this is correct or if I'm going down right path here.

Other thing I thought about was multiplying x . y = 1 by z on both sides to prove y=z but I'm a bit stuck.
Why "a bit stuck"? Where did you get stuck? Since multiplication is commutative, yes, if xy= 1 then zxy= (xz)y= z so y= z.

I'm also a bit confused about the last bit of the question where I have to conclude if x has inverse element (not entirely sure what this is) in Zn then the inverse element is unique.
An "inverse element" of x is another element, y, such that xy= yx= 1. For any "other inverse element", z, xz= 1.

Can anyone help please?


Sent from my iPhone using Physics Forums
I'm a bit puzzled why, on recognizing that you did not know the definitions well ("not entirely sure what this is"), you did not immediately look up and review the definitions.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top