Is the ionising power of alpha particles greater than that of gamma

AI Thread Summary
The ionizing power of alpha particles is greater than that of gamma rays due to their direct interactions with atomic electrons, which are influenced by the alpha particle's velocity and energy loss described by the Bethe Bloch equation. In alpha decay, both protons and neutrons decrease by two, resulting in an increased neutron-to-proton ratio in the daughter nucleus. The kinetic energy of electrons emitted during beta decay is derived from the conservation of lepton number, with energy distribution depending on the angles of emitted particles. The discussion includes specific examples, such as the decay of polonium-210 to lead-206, to illustrate these concepts. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for clarity in understanding nuclear decay processes and their implications on particle ratios.
kihr
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
I request for help in understanding the following:

Q1. Why is the ionising power of alpha particles greater than that of gamma rays?

Q2. Why does the ratio of neutrons to protons in a nucleus increase after the emission of
an alpha particle? I would like to have a quantitative idea, as I could not figure this
out myself.

Q3. How is the formula to be derived for the kinetic energy of electrons emitted during
beta decay?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Q1) The ionizing power of an alpha particle is by a direct interaction of the alpha particle with the atomic electrons in the material or gas. The interaction rate is dependent on the alpha particle velocity, and the energy loss of the alpha particle is given by the Bethe Bloch equation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethe_formula

Photons ionize only by the photoelectric effect or deep-core photoionization of bound electrons, or by Compton scattering off of free electrons. These electrons then ionize other electrons by scattering off atomic electrons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoelectric_effect

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/quantum/compeq.html

Q2) In alpha particle decay, both the number of protons and the number of neutrons in a nucleus are reduced by 2.

Q3) In beta decay, lepton number has to be conserved. Leptons include electrons, muons taus and 3 flavors of neutrinos, and their antiparticles. In negative beta decay, both an electron and an anti-neutrino are emitted. These two particles have to share the available energy. This leads to a continuous energy distribution for the electron, depending of the relative angle of the emitted electron and anti-neutrino..
For a discussion of the derivation, see
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/nuclear/beta2.html

http://www.princeton.edu/~romalis/PHYS312/Beta_spectrum.pdf

Bob S
 
Last edited:


Thanks for the references which I will go through. In the meanwhile I would request for clarity with respect to Q 2, as I am still not able to figure out as to how the ratio of neutrons to protons goes up following the emission of an alpha particle. By working out the ratios of N/Z in either case (i.e. for the mother nucleus and the daughter nucleus) I am not able to come to this conclusion. Hence I would request your help on this. Thanks.
 
Hi kihr-

This URL discusses the decay of polonium 210 to lead 206 by alpha decay.
http://www.lbl.gov/abc/wallchart/chapters/03/1.html

The polonium nucleus has 126 neutrons and 84 protons: n/p = 126/84 = 1.5000

The lead nucleus has 124 neutrons and 82 protons: n/p = 124/82 = 1.5122

(126-2)/(84-2) = 124/82

Bob S
 


Thanks for the help as well as for the reference. Actually I was trying to work out a general way to derive the solution to my problem using Z, A, and N, but I could not make much of a headway. By taking actual examples of alpha decay, of course, is easy to understand! Let me research a little more.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top