Is the Kecksburg UFO incident still a topic of debate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A recent town hall meeting sponsored by the Sci Fi Channel at the Kecksburg fire hall attracted around 50 attendees, aiming to foster dialogue between witnesses of a notable incident and skeptics. Participants discussed the unique aspects of the event, particularly the involvement of military personnel and the experiences of local eyewitnesses who reported being turned away and misdirected. The conversation also touched on historical references, including a quote from J. Edgar Hoover in FBI files related to the Roswell incident, which some participants found compelling as potential evidence of government interest in UFOs. The discussion highlighted differing interpretations of Hoover's motivations and the implications of the weather balloon narrative on public perception of UFOs. Overall, the meeting served as a platform for sharing insights and exploring the complexities surrounding these historical events.
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,194
Reaction score
2,491
"In an effort to encourage an open dialogue among first-hand witnesses and those who remain skeptical, the Sci Fi Channel sponsored a “town hall meeting” Saturday at the Kecksburg fire hall. About 50 people attended."

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/westmoreland/s_147868.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ivan,
I saw this on "Unsolved Mysteries"
a couple years go and it stood out in my mind as completely different
than most of the stuff in the genre: a whole town seeing all
those military types. Living
eyewitnesses reporting how they
were turned away, the kids being
told to misdirect people.

Given the story as it is, does it
smell like an extra-terrestrial,
or a classified military craft?
-zoob
 
Originally posted by zoobyshoe
Ivan,
I saw this on "Unsolved Mysteries"
a couple years go and it stood out in my mind as completely different
than most of the stuff in the genre: a whole town seeing all
those military types. Living
eyewitnesses reporting how they
were turned away, the kids being
told to misdirect people.

Given the story as it is, does it
smell like an extra-terrestrial,
or a classified military craft?
-zoob

I think this is a new story to me...unless I know it by a different name. I plan to learn more about this promptly.

Hey, did you see the notation from Hoover in the FBI files? I mention this in the Roswell section of the Napster; page 1. I find this to be highly compelling. What is your take? To what else could he have been referring? This gets darn close to a smoking gun don't you think...unless for some reason the FBI was being fooled into believing in UFOs? Then, the recent claims that the Ramey memo can be read seems [also mentioned in the Roswell section] also to gets close to smoking gun proof. It will be interesting to see if we find general agreement about the text of this memo or not.
 
Ivan,

The Hoover quote seems like it
might only be a reaction to the
initial story about the recovery
of a disc at Roswell.

For at least a day this story
stood as Government fact. Hoover,
who was an ambitious man, was
probably envious that he had no
access, and no reason to be grant-
ed access.

Because someone advised him to
stay out of it, we know merely
that he was trying to get into
it, probably simply in reaction to
the newspaper story.

His response to this advice is
a reasonable sounding, but actual-
very unreasonable, non-barter:
he would agree to stay out of it but only as long as they agree to
allow him access to the disc.

As it stands, with no follow up
info, the quote says very little
to me about Roswell, but a lot about Hoover. It is a reasonable
course of speculation to suppose
that the weather balloon story
killed Hoover's interest in the
subject.

-zoob
 
Thank you for the link Ivan, but we have a thread specifically designed for UFO discussions:

UFO THREAD
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Back
Top