Is the Limit Definition of Continuity Equivalent to the Standard Definition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Freye
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity
Freye
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

Continuity is generally expressed as lim x->a f(x)=f(a).
But is it also correct to express it as: lim h->0 f(x+h) - f(x) = 0?
Because that would imply that all numbers around f(x) would have to be very close to f(x), and that is basically what continuity is, no?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Freye said:
Hey guys,

Continuity is generally expressed as lim x->a f(x)=f(a).
But is it also correct to express it as: lim h->0 f(x+h) - f(x) = 0?
Because that would imply that all numbers around f(x) would have to be very close to f(x), and that is basically what continuity is, no?

Yes, this is fine (assuming f(x) exists)
 
Ok thank you, it really helps me out on a problem I am working on.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top