Is the Milky Way galactic blackhole slowly sucking us in?

arabianights
Messages
63
Reaction score
7
with the newest discovery of biggest black holes in the universe, i suddenly had this weird thought: what if they're a draining hole of the galaxy, the spiraled arms and the shape, all looks awfully similar to a whirlpool, with black holes at the center of nearly all galaxies
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't be afraid, this is NOT how black holes work. They are not literal "holes" in space that devour everything nearby. A black hole of 2 times the mass of the sun behaves EXACTLY like a normal star of that mass as long as objects stay outside a distance equal to the radius of the normal star.

For example, if the radius of the star was 1 million km, then as long as you stayed at a distance of at least 1 million km from an equal mass black hole, the gravitational pull is exactly the same. It is only once you get closer to the black hole that the gravity increases, since it is compacted into a much smaller volume of space.

If you compressed the Earth to 1/2 it's size, it would have no impact on how the Moon orbited, but the surface gravity would be somewhere on the order of 4 times as much as it is now. Make sense?
 
Black holes aren't cosmic vacuums. If a black hole the mass of the Sun (which wouldn't normally occur in nature, but can in principal) were to replace the Sun, we would continue to orbit around it at the same rate. This back hole is really heavy, but REALLY far away.

Don't lose sleep over it.
 
Drakkith said:
... if the radius of the star was 1 million km, then as long as you stayed at a distance of at least 1 million km from an equal mass black hole, the gravitational pull is exactly the same. It is only once you get closer to the black hole that the gravity increases, since it is compacted into a much smaller volume of space.

If you compressed the Earth to 1/2 it's size, it would have no impact on how the Moon orbited, but the surface gravity would be somewhere on the order of 4 times as much as it is now. Make sense?

Awesome example of gravity. Imo as easy to absorb as the "rubber sheet" analogy, but much much more descriptive of the physics.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top