Is the Moon's linear momentum p constant?

AI Thread Summary
The Moon's linear momentum is not constant due to its changing direction as it orbits the Earth, despite its speed being constant in a circular orbit. Linear momentum, being a vector, requires both magnitude and direction to remain constant, and since the Moon's direction changes continuously, its momentum varies. In contrast, the Moon's kinetic energy remains constant because it depends only on the mass and the magnitude of its velocity, both of which are constant in a circular orbit. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding vector versus scalar quantities in physics. Overall, while the Moon's kinetic energy is constant, its linear momentum is not.
Oripmav
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Question:

"The moon revolves around the Earth. Is the Moon's linear momentum p constant?(the p is supposed to be in italics and with an arrow over it pointing to the right. It's kinetic energy constant? Assume the orbit is circular."

Being this a concept question and not a math question I am having some trouble visualizing this problem. What exacly should I consider in order to formulate a good explanation? Any help will be STRONGLY appreciated since I have no physics background whatsoever.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Linear momentum is a vector function, i.e. it has both direction and magnitude. It depends on the magnitude of the mass of the object moving, the magnitude of the velocity with which the object is moving, and the direction in which the object is moving. If the linear momentum is to be constant, then all three of these must be constant. Here's a question for you, then: is the moon always moving in the same direction?

As for kinetic energy, kinetic energy is a scalar function, i.e. it has only magnitude. It depends on the magnitude of the mass and the magnitude of the velocity, but not the direction of the velocity. That said, let us consider the "circular" orbit of our super-conveniently perfect physics world moon. A circle is radially symmetric, i.e. it looks the same regardless of the angle from which you view it from the center. Because of this, there cannot be any differences in the magnitude of velocity, or else we would be able to distinguish which part of the circular orbit it is in. Since we can't do this, the magnitude of the velocity must be constant. The moon's mass is obviously constant, so the moon's kinetic energy will also be constant.

Hope this helps.

cookiemonster
 
Originally posted by Oripmav
What exacly should I consider in order to formulate a good explanation?
What basic laws of physics can you reasonably consider with the given information/situation (hint: what is conserved?)? Can the moon by itself be considered as a closed system (hint: why not?)?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top