Is the 'Natural' Food Movement Hindering Progress in the Culinary World?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BWV
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights a critical perspective on the contemporary disdain for industrialized food production, emphasizing that modern, processed food is often unfairly labeled as a disaster. The food historian argues that the romanticized view of natural foods overlooks historical realities, where "natural" often meant unpalatable or even toxic. For instance, grains require significant processing to become edible, and many plants can be harmful without proper preparation. The conversation critiques the notion that fresh and natural foods are inherently superior, suggesting that this belief is a recent development rather than a timeless truth. The terms "naturalistic fallacy" and "traditionalistic fallacy" are mentioned, indicating a critique of the idealization of traditional food practices.
BWV
Messages
1,571
Reaction score
1,925
A food historian gives a blast of reality to contemporary romantic views against the industrialized production of food which is in fact a miracle of science and economics:"Modern, fast, processed food is a disaster. That, at least, is the message conveyed by newspapers and magazines, on television cooking programs, and in prizewinning cookbooks.

It is a mark of sophistication to bemoan the steel roller mill and supermarket bread while yearning for stone ground flour and brick ovens; to seek out heirloom apples and pumpkins while despising modern tomatoes and hybrid corn; to be hostile to agronomists who develop high-yielding modern crops and to home economists who invent new recipes for General Mills.

...

That food should be fresh and natural has become an article of faith. It comes as something of a shock to realize that this is a latter-day creed. For our ancestors, natural was something quite nasty. Natural often tasted bad.
...

Natural was usually indigestible. Grains, which supplied from fifty to ninety percent of the calories in most societies have to be threshed, ground, and cooked to make them edible. Other plants, including the roots and fibers that were the life support of the societies that did not eat grains, are often downright poisonous. Without careful processing green potatoes, stinging taro, and cassava bitter with prussic acid are not just indigestible, but toxic.


https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/05/slow-food-artisanal-natural-preservatives/
 
  • Like
Likes Czcibor, Evo, russ_watters and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
Excellent article.
 
Great article. The naturalistic fallacy and traditionalistic fallacy* are intertwined.

*Did I just make that term up? I'm really not sure. Meh - either way, the "traditionalistic fallacy" is a real thing.
 
  • Like
Likes BWV
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top