Is the Orthogonal Complement of a Subspace of (Rn) Also a Subspace of (Rn)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter robierob12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The orthogonal complement of a subspace S of ℝⁿ, denoted as V, is indeed a subspace of ℝⁿ. This conclusion is supported by the Fundamental Subspace Theorem, which states that the column space of a matrix's transpose and the null space of that same matrix form a direct sum of ℝⁿ. The proof involves demonstrating that any linear combination of vectors in V remains within V, satisfying the criteria for a subspace. Thus, V is confirmed as a subspace of ℝⁿ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and subspaces
  • Familiarity with the Fundamental Subspace Theorem
  • Knowledge of inner product spaces
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra, including matrices and null spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of orthogonal complements in vector spaces
  • Learn about the Fundamental Subspace Theorem in detail
  • Explore the definitions and properties of inner products in ℝⁿ
  • Practice proving subspace properties using linear combinations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as educators looking to deepen their understanding of vector space properties.

robierob12
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Prove that the orthogonal complement of a subspace of (Rn) is itself a subspace of (Rn)

-----------------------------------------------------

Let V be the orthogonal complement of S, S a subspace of (Rn).

Let the set of vectors that span (Rn) be written as the columns of matrix A.

consider the homogenous equation

A(transpose)u=0

The solution space of the vectors u will all dot with any row vector from A transpose equaling zero.

So the null space of A transpose is the subspace V.

By (Fundamental Subspace Theroem) Two subspaces, Column space of a matricies transpose and the nullspace of that same matrix form a direct sum of (Rn).

Thus V is also a subspace of (Rn)

Does this make sense?
Am I trying way too hard here because this seems like it should be an easy one.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yea, that seems about right, although I think you want the columns to span S, not R^n.

It would probably be a good exercise to try to prove this directly from the definition of the orthogonal complement of a subspace, rather than appealing to that theorem.
 
I wouldn't do anything that complicated. In particular, there is no reason to appeal to "matrices". A subset of a vector space is a subspace if and only if au+ bv is a membere of subset whenever u and v are members of the subset and a and b scalars. If u and v are members of v and w a member of S, what is the innerproduct of (au+bv) with w?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K