Is the Path Difference Calculation Correct for Destructive Interference?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the path difference for destructive interference in a physics problem. The user initially finds the path difference as d=sqrt(4+x^2)-x and attempts to equate it to (n)(lambda)/2, where n is an odd integer. Confusion arises when algebraic simplifications lead to x^2-x^2=0, prompting questions about the correctness of the path difference calculation. The user realizes the need to properly square the terms and seeks clarification on part c of the problem. Ultimately, the conclusion suggests that destructive interference may not occur if x equals 0, leading to a frequency calculation of f=86Hz.
rteng
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1670a.jpg

1670b.jpg

1670c.jpg


Homework Equations



destructive interference occurs at 0.5(lambda), (3/2)(lambda),...



The Attempt at a Solution



I found the path difference to be:
d=sqrt(4+x^2)-x

and this has to be equal to (n)(lambda)/2 where n is an odd integer for destructive interference

this does not work out algebraically for me...as the x^2-x^2=0

is this path difference not correct?

do I just use f(n)=(nv)/(2d) to find d?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why did you do: x^2-x^2=0? Where does that come from?
 
ok I found my path difference to be sqrt(4+x^2)-x

so if I equate this to (n)(lambda)/2

then: sqrt(4+x^2)-x=(n)(lambda)/2

4+x^2-x^2=(n^2)(lambda^2)/4

there is my problem...
 
Do you know how to find lambda?
 
Oh, (sqrt(4 + x^2) - x)^2 = (sqrt(4 + x^2) - x) * (sqrt(4 + x^2) - x)
You don't just square the terms.
 
ah yes...of course

I think that should be the proper way to solve this problem...at least for a and b

now on to c...
 
ok I do not understand c
can anybody help?
 
I would say that the only way for which there be no destructive interference is if x is 0
but that revelation is really vague for me...could it be correct?
 
the I get f=86Hz
 
Back
Top