Is the Probability of Defect for an Item Produced by this Process Exactly 0.15?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
cb
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Here's the question:

A quality-control engineer samples 100 items manufactured by a certain process, and finds that 15 of them are defective. True or false:

(a.) The probability that an item produced by this process is defective is 0.15.

(b.) The probability that an item produced by this process id defective is likely to be close to 0.15, but not exactly equal to 0.15.

The book gives the answers False for (a.) and True for (b.).

I understand that since the two events can either be defective or not defective, they are mutually exclusive with equally likely outcomes and therefore:

P(E) = k / N, where k=number of outcomes in event and N=total outcomes

So I calculated that P(defective) = 0.15. Why would it be close but not exactly equal to 0.15?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's because the engineer's estimate is only a statistic. You can define a standard deviation or variance around that statistic. You can also make the statement "with Z% likelihood, the probability of defect is between 0.15-X and 0.15+X." But you may not claim that "the probability of defect is exactly equal to 0.15."
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top