Is the propagation velocity slow down at low audio frequency?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the propagation velocity of audio signals in cables at low frequencies, specifically questioning whether the velocity slows down to 5EE6 m/sec at 20Hz, as suggested by a paper from Belden cable company. Participants explore the implications of this phenomenon on cable performance and phase shifts, particularly in the context of RF applications.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references a paper claiming that the propagation velocity decreases significantly at low frequencies, contrasting it with the expected velocity calculated using the formula involving permeability and permittivity.
  • Another participant acknowledges the increase in characteristic impedance at low frequencies and discusses the relevance of skin depth in relation to conductor thickness.
  • A participant expresses skepticism about the significance of the impedance rise and focuses on confirming the claimed propagation velocity, noting their experience is primarily in RF frequencies.
  • Concerns are raised about the practical implications of a 1.44-degree phase shift over a 1m cable at 20Hz, suggesting that this may not be substantial for typical interconnect lengths.
  • Further discussion emphasizes that the comparison of cable performance should be made against other cables rather than an ideal scenario, questioning the extent of improvement possible with high-quality materials.
  • One participant suggests that at very low frequencies, phase advance and dispersion are not significant, but warns about potential issues around the transition frequency of cables.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of the propagation velocity slowing down at low frequencies, with some expressing skepticism about its significance while others acknowledge the phenomenon. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the practical impact of these findings on cable performance.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the relationship between velocity, frequency, and phase shifts is complex, with some suggesting that assumptions about ideal conditions may not hold true in practical scenarios. The discussion highlights the dependence on specific cable characteristics and the limitations of simplified models.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
I uploaded the paper from Belden cable company. It said the velocity slows down to 5EE6 m/sec from 1EE8 m/sec at RF speed. I don't remember I ever read this before, I thought velocity = 1/sqrt( μ/ε).

Please give me a link on the reason if this is true.

Thanks

Alan
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Apart from goods promotions (which are mostly insignificant) in the paper you linked, the phenomenon of increased characteristic impedance of cables at very low frequency is true. The impedance transition frequency is the frequency where skin depth is comparable with the thickness of conductors. At lower frequency, fields are no longer effectively confined to dielectric and simplified formula involving only parameters of dielectric no longer works.
 
Thanks for the reply, I don't think rise of impedance is of importance. I mainly want to confirm the velocity of propagation really slow down to 5EE6m/s and 20Hz. I always work in RF, never even thought of 20Hz and never seen any book talk about at this low frequency.

I did a quick calculation, even if I accept the 5EE6m/s, at 20Hz, I calculated the propagation is about 1.44deg going through a 1m long cable. That's not much of a phase shift. Usually interconnect cables are less than 1m long ( I won't use longer than that if I can help it.) as the capacitance of the cable do go up. It's about 30pF/ft, the longer the cable, the more the shunt capacitance. For old tube equipment, output impedance is higher, it might affect the high frequency response ( again, that's also a stretch).
 
Also, more importantly, even if it is true the velocity slow down to 5EE6m/s and phase delay is 1.44deg/m for 20Hz. This is compare to a PERFECT situation where the velocity of propagation is the same at all frequency.

BUT, this is a cable comparison, meaning it is compare one cable to another, not comparing a cable to perfect condition of equal velocity. The question remains how much one can improve the velocity on the best cable material compare to the average cable. Say, if the best of the best cable only improved to say 1deg/m, that improvement is so minor that it won't matter in all do respect.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: trurle
yungman said:
Also, more importantly, even if it is true the velocity slow down to 5EE6m/s and phase delay is 1.44deg/m for 20Hz. This is compare to a PERFECT situation where the velocity of propagation is the same as all frequency.

BUT, this is a cable comparison, meaning it is compare one cable to another, not comparing a cable to perfect condition. The question remains how much one can improve the velocity on the best cable material. Say, if the best of the best cable only improved to say 1deg/m, that improvement is so minor that it won't matter in all do respect.
Yes, you catch the idea. In worst case, velocity is proportional to square root of frequency, while phase advance is linearly proportional to frequency. Therefore, at very low frequencies phase advance and phase dispersion are not significant. You should watch out for phase dispersion at around transition frequency of cable though.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K