Is the Quotient Rule Necessary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Superstring
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    quotient
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the necessity of the quotient rule in calculus, questioning whether the product rule can suffice for all cases. While it's possible to rewrite a quotient as a product, using the quotient rule is often more convenient due to its direct application. Many students find the algebraic manipulations required for the product rule more challenging than the calculus itself. The quotient rule simplifies the process by providing a single fraction without the need for additional steps. Ultimately, the quotient rule serves as a useful tool that can enhance clarity and efficiency in differentiation.
Superstring
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
If you can write, for example
\frac{cosx}{x+1} = (cosx)(x+1)^{-1}
then what is the point of the quotient rule? Can't you just use the product rule for everything?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Superstring said:
If you can write, for example
\frac{cosx}{x+1} = (cosx)(x+1)^{-1}
then what is the point of the quotient rule? Can't you just use the product rule for everything?
Yep. (don't forget you're using the power rule and chain rule too )

But the quotient rule comes up often enough it's more convenient to use it directly.
 
Superstring said:
If you can write, for example
\frac{cosx}{x+1} = (cosx)(x+1)^{-1}
then what is the point of the quotient rule? Can't you just use the product rule for everything?

Yes. But using the product rule for such as that frequently requires an extra simplification step to combine the fractions. And for many students, such manipulations as adding fractions with algebra expressions seem to be more difficult than the calculus. With the quotient rule you automatically get a single fraction.
 
Also if you think of it as an extension of the product rule, you'll never forget the order of the terms in the numerator of the quotient rule, because the minus sign comes from taking the derivative of the denominator g(x)^{-1}.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K