MHB Is the Solution Unique? Investigating the Uniqueness of a Boundary Value Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

Suppose that we have the following boundary value problem:

$$a^2 u_{xx}=u_t, 0<x<L, t>0 \\ u(x,0)=f(x) , 0 \leq x \leq L\\ u(0,t)=0, u(L,t)=0, t>0$$

By supposing that $u(x,t)=X(x) T(t)$ we find that the solution is of the form $u(x,t)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_n e^{-\frac{n^2 \pi^2 a^2 t}{L^2}} \sin{\frac{n \pi x}{L}}$

where $c_n=\frac{2}{L} \int_0^L f(x) \sin{\frac{n \pi x}{L}}$.

But do we know that this solution is unique? Or could there also be an other solution that will not be of the form $X(x) T(t)$ ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you have isn't "of the form X(x)T(t)"! It is a sum of such, basically a Fourier series. Now, what do you mean by "unique"? You may be able to write the solution in a different form but it will be the same function. It is easy to show that there is only one solution to this problem: suppose there were two, u_1(x, t) and u_2(x, t). Then u(x, t)= u_1(x, t)- u_2(x, t) satisfies the same differential equation but with all boundary and initial conditions equal to 0. And it is easy to show that only the zero function, 0 for all x and t, satisfies that.
 
HallsofIvy said:
What you have isn't "of the form X(x)T(t)"! It is a sum of such, basically a Fourier series. Now, what do you mean by "unique"? You may be able to write the solution in a different form but it will be the same function. It is easy to show that there is only one solution to this problem: suppose there were two, u_1(x, t) and u_2(x, t). Then u(x, t)= u_1(x, t)- u_2(x, t) satisfies the same differential equation but with all boundary and initial conditions equal to 0. And it is easy to show that only the zero function, 0 for all x and t, satisfies that.

Ok, I see. Thank you! (Smile)
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K