Is the Sturm-Liouville Operator Symmetric in Inner Product Spaces?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Poirot1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Sturm-Liouville operator is symmetric (Hermitian) with respect to an inner product space defined by the integral $$\langle f|g\rangle:=\int_{A}\overline{f}\,g\,w(x)\,d\mu$$ if it satisfies the condition $$\langle Lf|g\rangle=\langle f|Lg\rangle$$ for all functions f and g within the space. The operator is expressed as $$L=\frac{1}{w(x)}\left(-\frac{d}{dx}\left[p(x)\,\frac{d}{dx}\right]+q(x)\right)$$. Demonstrating this symmetry involves integration by parts, where boundary terms vanish under specific conditions. Understanding these concepts is crucial for deeper insights into functional analysis and differential equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inner product spaces, specifically in the context of functional analysis.
  • Familiarity with Sturm-Liouville theory and its applications in differential equations.
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, particularly integration by parts.
  • Basic concepts of Lebesgue integration and measure theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian operators in functional analysis.
  • Learn about the applications of Sturm-Liouville problems in physics and engineering.
  • Explore the role of weight functions, such as $$w(x)$$, in defining inner products.
  • Investigate boundary value problems and their solutions using Sturm-Liouville theory.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers interested in differential equations, functional analysis, and the applications of Sturm-Liouville theory in various fields.

Poirot1
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
What does it mean for Sturm-Liouville operator to be symmetric w.r.t an inner product?

I was reading in a book that it is symmetric but that was about a certain integral being zero and inner products had not even been mentioned.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to generalize the concept of "inner product". In normal 3D-space, it's called the dot product:
$$\langle \vec{x}|\vec{y}\rangle=\vec{x}\cdot\vec{y}=\sum_{j=1}^{3}x_{j}y_{j}.$$
But there are other "spaces" out there: metric spaces, normed spaces, inner product spaces, Banach spaces, Hilbert spaces, Sobolev spaces. They each have different axioms with which you start. The inner product space is fairly general, and the "vectors" can be the usual vectors in 3D space, or they could be functions in a function space. The usual inner product defined in a function space is
$$\langle f|g\rangle:=\int_{A} \overline{f} \,g\,d\mu.$$
Here $\overline{f}$ indicates the complex conjugate of $f$, and the $d\mu$ indicates that we've defined this integral to be a Lebesgue integral. $A$ is the set over which the function space is defined.

Now we have the background to answer your question. A Sturm-Liouville operator
$$L=\frac{1}{w(x)}\left(-\frac{d}{dx}\left[p(x)\,\frac{d}{dx}\right]+q(x)\right)$$
is symmetric (more properly, Hermitian) w.r.t. the inner product
$$\langle f|g\rangle:=\int_{A}\overline{f}\,g\,w(x)\,d\mu,$$
if and only if for every $f, g$ in the inner product space, it is true that
$$\langle Lf|g\rangle=\langle f|Lg\rangle.$$
With the Sturm-Liouville operator, you need to show that
$$\int_{A}\overline{\left\{\frac{1}{w(x)}\left(-\frac{d}{dx}\left[p(x)\,\frac{df}{dx}\right]+q(x)f\right)\right\}}\,g\,w(x)\,d\mu=\int_{A} \overline{f} \left\{\frac{1}{w(x)}\left(-\frac{d}{dx}\left[p(x)\,\frac{dg}{dx}\right]+q(x)g\right)\right\}\,w(x)\,d\mu.$$

You can do this using simple integration by parts twice. The boundary terms vanish because of the conditions on them. (Note that the boundary conditions are considered to be part of the operator.)

I note you marked this thread as solved. That is good. Perhaps this post will throw in a few helpful concepts.
 
Sorry you took your time. I should perhaps do a bit more reasearch before asking here.
 
Poirot said:
Sorry you took your time. I should perhaps do a bit more reasearch before asking here.

No, that's all right. Incidentally, there are some concepts here that might help you with your other problem. Take a look at how $w(x)$ appears in the Sturm-Liouville operator, as well as how it shows up in the inner product w.r.t. which the Sturm-Liouville operator is symmetric.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K