Is the Temperature Distribution in Molecular Simulation Uniform?

  • Thread starter Thread starter only18922
  • Start date Start date
only18922
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In molecular simulation, the two sides (X direction) of the simulating system has fixed temperature 300 k. The middle area is free to any constraint. Then we add a electrical field to the system along X direction. After some time steps,the temperature distribution along X direction looks like gauss distribution. The problem is,im my opinion,the temperature is supposed to distributed uniformly. Otherwise,we may need to make the wire we use smaller on two ends and bigger in the middle?
Anyway,can anybody explain the results?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How can you have a uniform gradient when both ends are fixed at the same temperature?
 
By saying uniformly distributed, I mean the temperature in the middle area (free to MD run) is supposed to distributed uniformly. If u think it has to be guass type,why do u think so?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top