Is the 'test charge' in electric potential energy defined as immobile?

AI Thread Summary
The concept of electric potential energy (EPE) relies on the assumption that the "test charge" is immobile within the electric field. This immobility is crucial because if the test charge were to move, an opposing force would counteract the electric field, preventing acceleration. The test charge, denoted as ##q##, serves as a tool for measuring the electric field rather than as an active participant. By measuring the force vector ##\vec F## on the test charge, one can calculate the electric field at that specific location using the formula ##\vec F/q##. Understanding this distinction is essential for accurately defining and applying electric potential energy concepts.
archaic
Messages
688
Reaction score
214
Hello, quick question, when EPE was defined, did we decide that the "test charge" is immobile in the field? Otherwise a force equal and opposite to that of the electric field would just stop the charge from accelerating.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A test charge ##q## is just an artifact that can be considered as "an electric field measuring device". If you can measure the force vector ##\vec F## on it at a given point in space, then ##\vec F/q## gives the electric field at that point in space.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top