Is the Velocity of a Multistage Rocket Really Lower than a Single Stage Rocket?

  • Thread starter Thread starter musik132
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mit ocw Rocket
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison of velocities between a two-stage rocket and a single-stage rocket, with the results suggesting that the two-stage rocket's velocity is lower than that of the single-stage rocket. This interpretation raises questions about the effectiveness of multi-stage rockets, which are typically designed to achieve higher terminal velocities. However, the analysis in problem 7.1 assumes both rockets have the same final mass, which is unrealistic for practical applications. In reality, multi-stage rockets are advantageous because they can achieve a lower final mass, allowing for more efficient payload delivery into orbit. Overall, the assumptions in the problem may not accurately reflect the operational benefits of multi-stage rocket designs.
musik132
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
The result found in problem 7.1 says that the velocity of the two stage rocket(v1 in the derivation in the link below) < velocity of a single stage rocket(v2). Am i misinterpreting the results since I thought that the purpose of a multistage rocket was to attain higher terminal velocities. If the derivation is wrong can you show me where because the mathematical operations and the logic behind it look fine to me.

http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-01-physics-i-classical-mechanics-fall-1999/assignments/sol7.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, it depends on the comparison. The typical use-case is "I want to launch x tons into orbit, how can I do that". There, a multi-stage rocket is better.
In problem 7.1, it is assumed that both rockets have the same final mass - that is completely unrealistic for the same payload. The advantage of a multi-stage rocket is the lower final mass...
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top