Is the VLSI field oversaturated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maxwell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Vlsi
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the saturation of the VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration) field in the job market, particularly in the context of electrical engineering (EE) specializations for graduate school. Participants explore various areas of specialization, including VLSI, communications, control systems, and signal processing, and share their experiences and preferences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern that VLSI jobs are scarce in the defense industry, suggesting that the field may be oversaturated with candidates who lack other options in EE.
  • Another participant suggests communication systems as a currently popular field in EE, according to IEEE.
  • A participant shares their enjoyment of communications classes and considers combining communications with VLSI studies, expressing a preference for designing wireless chips.
  • One participant reflects on their indecision regarding specialization, noting fluctuating interests in various EE areas.
  • Another participant mentions their focus on device physics and solid-state devices as part of their double major in EE and physics.
  • A later reply argues that signal processing, both analog and digital, is a strong field due to its broad applicability and suggests it will remain relevant in the future.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the saturation of the VLSI field and the desirability of various specializations. There is no consensus on whether VLSI is oversaturated, and multiple competing views on the best area of specialization remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants' opinions are influenced by personal experiences and perceptions of job market trends, which may not reflect broader industry realities. The discussion includes subjective assessments of various fields and their future prospects.

Maxwell
Messages
511
Reaction score
0
I am trying to decide on my area specialization for graduate school. I really like VLSI design. However, I get the feeling that because VLSI jobs are not common in the defense industry, the field is very saturated with people who don't have other options for EE work in the US (non-US citizens).

For that reason, I am considering another area of specialization that is more useful across the entire EE industry spectrum. Control systems or signal processing, for example. I am definitely going to pair some VLSI courses with these topics, but I would not be going fully towards VLSI. Therefore, I would be able to apply for a larger range of jobs.

Does anyone in the industry have any opinions? I could be really off target (I hope so), so please let me know.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Are you interested in communication systems? That's the hot EE field right now, according to IEEE.
 
Well, I've taken two communications classes, and I did enjoy them. One of them was a digital comm class and I actually liked it a lot. Viterbi algorithm, trellis codes, etc. were all pretty interesting. That's one possible route - to combine communications and VLSI classes. I'm more of a circuits/electronics person, so if I'm going the comm. route, I'd like to design wireless chips. I was thinking about taking a low power design for wireless circuits course.

I'm happy I took a huge amount of EE electives during undergrad so I'm able to make an informed decision before I just jump into a field, but the problem is I don't want to choose just one. One week I'm interested in one area, and the next week I'm interested in something else. It's all very interesting, but it's hard to say what I want to specialize in.

Have you decided what you're going to do?
 
Maxwell said:
Well, I've taken two communications classes, and I did enjoy them. One of them was a digital comm class and I actually liked it a lot. Viterbi algorithm, trellis codes, etc. were all pretty interesting. That's one possible route - to combine communications and VLSI classes. I'm more of a circuits/electronics person, so if I'm going the comm. route, I'd like to design wireless chips. I was thinking about taking a low power design for wireless circuits course.

I'm happy I took a huge amount of EE electives during undergrad so I'm able to make an informed decision before I just jump into a field, but the problem is I don't want to choose just one. One week I'm interested in one area, and the next week I'm interested in something else. It's all very interesting, but it's hard to say what I want to specialize in.

Have you decided what you're going to do?

device physics/physical electronics. I will be starting graduate school (PhD) in fall '08 studying physics or possibly electrical engineering, but either way it will be in the device physics field. I'm not sure which degree will better suit me for that field. Either one would work, I would think.
 
There were generally two subjects I really became obsessed with in my double major in EE and physics...they were fields and solid state devices.
 
It's true that purely digital designers are seen as being rather easy to find. In my opinion, signal processing (both analog and digital) is an excellent field, since it's applicable almost everywhere. You'll never have a hard time finding a way to apply your skill set. This is true now, and will continue to be true for the forseeable future.

- Warren
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K