Is the Water Cup Vacuum Trick Real or Just a Viral Video Hoax?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Emlett
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Property Water
AI Thread Summary
The water cup vacuum trick showcased in the viral video is likely a hoax rather than a legitimate demonstration. Replication attempts have been unsuccessful, and the creator's other videos suggest a focus on computer graphics rather than genuine science. Observations indicate that specific props, like a small elephant and cold medicine, are necessary for the trick to be effective, implying manipulation. The technique may involve advanced editing, including splicing and photoshopping, along with the use of ice to create the illusion. Overall, the trick appears designed to entertain rather than educate on real scientific principles.
Emlett
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I recently saw a youtube video in which someone filled a cup with water and created a vacuum with a piece of cardboard. Then, he transfers it to a table and removes the cup using a twisting motion. The end result is the water retaining the form of a cup. Is this actually possible? Also, can you explain why or why not?

Here is the link for the video:
Code:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ctaA2mERzI

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I was unable to find another video that showed a replication of the trick despite being the video being so popular. Also, I have noted that his other uploaded videos are demonstrations of his CG work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Watch very closely at frames 1:46 to 1:48. You have to have a small statue of an elephant and a bottle of cold medicine nearby or the trick won't work. This is very obviously a viral video to see how much of a mess he can cause in the form of wet kitchen floors across the globe. Be sure to have a tiny elephant and some cold medication handy to prevent this from happening.

In addition, skills at splicing clips together, a little photoshopping, and casting very clear and cold ice inside a glass cup are a must. Above all, don't forget the twisting motion.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top