Is the wavefunction for this system unique?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving wavefunctions and energy levels for a particle in a two-dimensional box. Participants are tasked with finding the wavefunction, exploring its uniqueness, and calculating probabilities for various energy states.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the form of the wavefunction and energy levels, with some questioning the normalization of the proposed wavefunction. There are attempts to clarify the correct expression for energy and the implications of degeneracy in energy levels. Some participants suggest that the wavefunction can be expressed as a linear combination of states, while others raise concerns about the uniqueness of the wavefunction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with multiple interpretations being explored regarding the wavefunction's form and normalization. Some participants provide corrections and alternative expressions, while others question the assumptions made about the energy levels and the existence of certain states. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive lines of inquiry are being pursued.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the expressions for energy and the wavefunction, including concerns about normalization and the existence of states with quantum number n=0. The problem also specifies that the probability of finding a particle in states with n≥2 is negligible, which influences the discussion on probabilities for the ground and excited states.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



344eeip.png


Part (a): Find wavefunction and energy levels.
Part (b): Find a possible wavefunction. Is this wavefunction unique?
Part (c): What is the probability of finding it in the ground state?
Part (d): What's the probability of finding it in the second excited state?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a)
I have found the wavefunction and energy levels:

\phi = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}sin\left(\frac{n_x \pi x}{a}\right)sin\left(\frac{n_y \pi y}{a}\right)

E = \frac{\hbar^2}{8ma^2}(n_x^2 + n_y^2)

If a = b, there is degeneracy in the first excited state: |nx,ny> |1,0> and |0,1> give the same energy.

Part (b)
E = E_0 + \frac{(E_1-E_0)}{4} = \frac{3}{4}E_0 + \frac{1}{4}E_1

I'm guessing the wavefunction will be a linear combination of ground and first excited state:

|\psi \rangle = \frac{3}{4}|\psi_0\rangle + \frac{1}{4}|\psi_1\rangle
|\psi \rangle = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\sqrt{\frac{2}{b}}\left[\frac{3}{4} sin(\frac{\pi x}{a})sin(\frac{\pi y}{a}) +\frac{1}{4}sin(\frac{2\pi x}{a})sin(\frac{2\pi y}{a})\right]

But the thing is, this wavefunction isn't normalized, as ##(\frac{1}{4})^2 + (\frac{3}{4})^2 = \frac{10}{16}##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think that |\psi \rangle = \frac{3}{4}|\psi_0\rangle + \frac{1}{4}|\psi_1\rangle its wrong

the correct could be |\psi \rangle = (\frac{3}{4})^{1/2}|\psi_0\rangle + (\frac{1}{4})^{1/2}|\psi_1\rangle
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
unscientific said:
Part (a)
I have found the wavefunction and energy levels:

\phi = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}sin\left(\frac{n_x \pi x}{a}\right)sin\left(\frac{n_y \pi y}{a}\right)

E = \frac{\hbar^2}{8ma^2}(n_x^2 + n_y^2)

If a = b, there is degeneracy in the first excited state: |nx,ny> |1,0> and |0,1> give the same energy.

The expression for ##E## seems to be wrong, or is it just me? Is that ##8## in denominator just a typo or... ? You should check that, because I also think ##\pi ## is missing.

Also note that if ##n=0## there is nothing happening. The probability to find a particle is ##|\psi |^2=\frac{2}{a}sin^2(\frac{n\pi }{a}x)=0## if ##n=0## also the energy of state with ##n=0## is zero. Therefore state with ##n=0## does NOT exist. Ground state is ##n=1##.
 
Fisica said:
i think that |\psi \rangle = \frac{3}{4}|\psi_0\rangle + \frac{1}{4}|\psi_1\rangle its wrong

the correct could be |\psi \rangle = (\frac{3}{4})^{1/2}|\psi_0\rangle + (\frac{1}{4})^{1/2}|\psi_1\rangle

That's right, because ##E = \langle \psi| H | \psi \rangle##.

But it's not unique, right? Because the state can be exapanded as a series of eigenkets: ##|\psi\rangle = \sum_n a_n |E_n\rangle##.
 
Last edited:
skrat said:
The expression for ##E## seems to be wrong, or is it just me? Is that ##8## in denominator just a typo or... ? You should check that, because I also think ##\pi ## is missing.

Sorry it should be ##h## instead of ##\hbar##. The correct energy is ##E = \frac{h}{8ma^2}##
skrat said:
Also note that if ##n=0## there is nothing happening. The probability to find a particle is ##|\psi |^2=\frac{2}{a}sin^2(\frac{n\pi }{a}x)=0## if ##n=0## also the energy of state with ##n=0## is zero. Therefore state with ##n=0## does NOT exist. Ground state is ##n=1##.

Yea that's right. I think they usually use ##E_0## to denote ground state but the '0' really means n=1 state.

Is the probability ## \frac{3}{4} ## then?
 
Last edited:
Also note that the reason the state is not unique is that there is an arbitrary phase ø between the states |ψ> = a|ψ1> + e b|ψ2>.
 
unscientific said:
Sorry it should be ##h## instead of ##\hbar##. The correct energy is ##E = \frac{h}{8ma^2}##

Close enough. It's actually ##E_n=\frac{\hbar ^2\pi ^2n^2}{2ma^2}=\frac{h^2n^2}{8ma^2}##
unscientific said:
Is the probability ## \frac{3}{4} ## then?

Yes, to find/measure the particle with ##E_0## (particle in ground state) the probability is ##\frac{3}{4}##.
 
skrat said:
Close enough. It's actually ##E_n=\frac{\hbar ^2\pi ^2n^2}{2ma^2}=\frac{h^2n^2}{8ma^2}##

Yeah you're right. I keep missing stuff out..


skrat said:
Yes, to find/measure the particle with ##E_0## (particle in ground state) the probability is ##\frac{3}{4}##.

Just that for 4 marks? It seems too easy to be true!

And for part (c), the probability for finding the particle in second excited state is...##\frac{1}{4}##? And again that for 3 marks?!
 
Well the problem says that ##E=\frac{3}{4}E_0+\frac{1}{4}E_1## and coefficient before ##E_n## is the probability to find particle in state ##n##.

The problem alsto states that the probability to find a particle in any state with ##n\geq 2## is basically equal to zero. It is trivial to check that, because ##3/4 +1/4 = 1##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
There might be a small probability the state might not be E0 or E1 as long as the probability is small enough that a 1000 particle sample might just have missed it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K