Is the wavefunction for this system unique?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the wavefunction and energy levels for a quantum system. The derived wavefunction is expressed as a combination of sine functions, with energy levels showing degeneracy in the first excited state when parameters are equal. The uniqueness of the wavefunction is questioned, revealing that it can be expressed as a linear combination of eigenstates, indicating non-uniqueness due to arbitrary phase factors. The probability of finding the particle in the ground state is determined to be 3/4, while the probability for the second excited state is 1/4, with negligible probabilities for higher states. The conversation emphasizes the importance of normalization and the correct representation of energy levels in quantum mechanics.
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



344eeip.png


Part (a): Find wavefunction and energy levels.
Part (b): Find a possible wavefunction. Is this wavefunction unique?
Part (c): What is the probability of finding it in the ground state?
Part (d): What's the probability of finding it in the second excited state?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a)
I have found the wavefunction and energy levels:

\phi = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}sin\left(\frac{n_x \pi x}{a}\right)sin\left(\frac{n_y \pi y}{a}\right)

E = \frac{\hbar^2}{8ma^2}(n_x^2 + n_y^2)

If a = b, there is degeneracy in the first excited state: |nx,ny> |1,0> and |0,1> give the same energy.

Part (b)
E = E_0 + \frac{(E_1-E_0)}{4} = \frac{3}{4}E_0 + \frac{1}{4}E_1

I'm guessing the wavefunction will be a linear combination of ground and first excited state:

|\psi \rangle = \frac{3}{4}|\psi_0\rangle + \frac{1}{4}|\psi_1\rangle
|\psi \rangle = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\sqrt{\frac{2}{b}}\left[\frac{3}{4} sin(\frac{\pi x}{a})sin(\frac{\pi y}{a}) +\frac{1}{4}sin(\frac{2\pi x}{a})sin(\frac{2\pi y}{a})\right]

But the thing is, this wavefunction isn't normalized, as ##(\frac{1}{4})^2 + (\frac{3}{4})^2 = \frac{10}{16}##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think that |\psi \rangle = \frac{3}{4}|\psi_0\rangle + \frac{1}{4}|\psi_1\rangle its wrong

the correct could be |\psi \rangle = (\frac{3}{4})^{1/2}|\psi_0\rangle + (\frac{1}{4})^{1/2}|\psi_1\rangle
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
unscientific said:
Part (a)
I have found the wavefunction and energy levels:

\phi = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}sin\left(\frac{n_x \pi x}{a}\right)sin\left(\frac{n_y \pi y}{a}\right)

E = \frac{\hbar^2}{8ma^2}(n_x^2 + n_y^2)

If a = b, there is degeneracy in the first excited state: |nx,ny> |1,0> and |0,1> give the same energy.

The expression for ##E## seems to be wrong, or is it just me? Is that ##8## in denominator just a typo or... ? You should check that, because I also think ##\pi ## is missing.

Also note that if ##n=0## there is nothing happening. The probability to find a particle is ##|\psi |^2=\frac{2}{a}sin^2(\frac{n\pi }{a}x)=0## if ##n=0## also the energy of state with ##n=0## is zero. Therefore state with ##n=0## does NOT exist. Ground state is ##n=1##.
 
Fisica said:
i think that |\psi \rangle = \frac{3}{4}|\psi_0\rangle + \frac{1}{4}|\psi_1\rangle its wrong

the correct could be |\psi \rangle = (\frac{3}{4})^{1/2}|\psi_0\rangle + (\frac{1}{4})^{1/2}|\psi_1\rangle

That's right, because ##E = \langle \psi| H | \psi \rangle##.

But it's not unique, right? Because the state can be exapanded as a series of eigenkets: ##|\psi\rangle = \sum_n a_n |E_n\rangle##.
 
Last edited:
skrat said:
The expression for ##E## seems to be wrong, or is it just me? Is that ##8## in denominator just a typo or... ? You should check that, because I also think ##\pi ## is missing.

Sorry it should be ##h## instead of ##\hbar##. The correct energy is ##E = \frac{h}{8ma^2}##
skrat said:
Also note that if ##n=0## there is nothing happening. The probability to find a particle is ##|\psi |^2=\frac{2}{a}sin^2(\frac{n\pi }{a}x)=0## if ##n=0## also the energy of state with ##n=0## is zero. Therefore state with ##n=0## does NOT exist. Ground state is ##n=1##.

Yea that's right. I think they usually use ##E_0## to denote ground state but the '0' really means n=1 state.

Is the probability ## \frac{3}{4} ## then?
 
Last edited:
Also note that the reason the state is not unique is that there is an arbitrary phase ø between the states |ψ> = a|ψ1> + e b|ψ2>.
 
unscientific said:
Sorry it should be ##h## instead of ##\hbar##. The correct energy is ##E = \frac{h}{8ma^2}##

Close enough. It's actually ##E_n=\frac{\hbar ^2\pi ^2n^2}{2ma^2}=\frac{h^2n^2}{8ma^2}##
unscientific said:
Is the probability ## \frac{3}{4} ## then?

Yes, to find/measure the particle with ##E_0## (particle in ground state) the probability is ##\frac{3}{4}##.
 
skrat said:
Close enough. It's actually ##E_n=\frac{\hbar ^2\pi ^2n^2}{2ma^2}=\frac{h^2n^2}{8ma^2}##

Yeah you're right. I keep missing stuff out..


skrat said:
Yes, to find/measure the particle with ##E_0## (particle in ground state) the probability is ##\frac{3}{4}##.

Just that for 4 marks? It seems too easy to be true!

And for part (c), the probability for finding the particle in second excited state is...##\frac{1}{4}##? And again that for 3 marks?!
 
Well the problem says that ##E=\frac{3}{4}E_0+\frac{1}{4}E_1## and coefficient before ##E_n## is the probability to find particle in state ##n##.

The problem alsto states that the probability to find a particle in any state with ##n\geq 2## is basically equal to zero. It is trivial to check that, because ##3/4 +1/4 = 1##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #10
There might be a small probability the state might not be E0 or E1 as long as the probability is small enough that a 1000 particle sample might just have missed it.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Back
Top