Is There a Bijection from A to X if B is a Subset of X?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bijection
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
This is something I have been wondering about. Let f:A->B
be a bijection. If B is a subset of X. Can there still exist a bijection from A to X?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But A is already fully mapped onto B, so which elements of A are left to map onto the X - B?
 
Well the cardinality of the rationals, natural numbers and even natural numbers are the same.
So there exists a bijection between each of these sets even though, the even natural numbers are a subset of the natural numbers. So I think you're actually wrong?
 
I asked a question; I did not provide an answer.

However it seems that you now know the answer: I think you are saying "for finite sets the answer is NO; for infinite sets the answer is YES". Next you should go ahead and construct an example using the set of natural numbers and subsets of odds and evens.
 
You might want to re-write the question to specify that B is a proper subset of X.
 
UltrafastPED said:
I asked a question; I did not provide an answer.

However it seems that you now know the answer: I think you are saying "for finite sets the answer is NO; for infinite sets the answer is YES". Next you should go ahead and construct an example using the set of natural numbers and subsets of odds and evens.
It should be mentioned that it isn't always true for infinite sets. E.g., take ##A = B = \mathbb{R}## and ##X = \mathbb{Z}##. In general it will be possible only if ##X## has the same cardinality as ##B## (and hence the same cardinality as ##A##).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top