Is There a Faster Way to Factor Than Just Guessing Factors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tyrion101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factoring
Tyrion101
Messages
166
Reaction score
2
One of my quadratic formula problems required me to factor so that the product of 2050s factors added to -23, that may not be exact, but I basically asked for a new problem since it was just practice, after an hour of getting close but never the right answer, and I was wondering, other than just using the computer program I wrote (which would likely be cheating) is there anything that gets me an answer faster than just guessing factors?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So you were supposed to find numbers a,b such that their product is 2050 and their sum is -23? That is not possible (at least not with real numbers).

Anyway, I would do it like that:
As a+b=-23, we can write b=-23-a.
Plug this into a*b=2050 and you get a regular quadratic equation. With the numbers in your post, it does not have solutions, but with other numbers it has.
 
You had something like x^2 - 23x + 2050?

2050
2 - 1025
5 - 205
5 - 41
41 - 0

2050 is 2.5^2.41

Knowing the small primes helps. For example, I knew that 41 is prime. But also, there is an easy way to check. If a number n is composite, it has a prime factor ≤ ##\sqrt{n}##. So with 41, if it is composite, it has a prime factor < 7, so check 2,3,5, none divides it, so it is prime.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top